Stricter animal cruelty law passed

Sullivan 'pleaded to a misdemeanor' and the judge granted the lifetime ban and sentenced him to 240 days in jail.

It was brought to the judges attention that the "amendment" under ponces law for "life time ban" would take affect Oct 1.

Judge rescinded only the lifetime ban part of the sentence.

""County Judge Dawn Fields granted the lifetime ban plus sentenced Sullivan to 240 days in the county jail.
Fields on Wednesday rescinded the lifetime ban after the issue was brought to her attention.
The jail sentence already conforms with current law so that stands.""

It hasn't been that long ago that all these animal abusers walked scot free. I was a humane officer for several years and have viewed the carnage, brought the abusers up on charges, only to see just about all of them walk away without any jail time and re offend. Before people rallied to change the laws.

So, I am very glad to see the laws change to convict and send them to jail.

And again the reason I posted it was for others to present it as a precedent to encourage their states to change the laws to include: felony charges, jail time,and ban ownership. It is much easier to present a bill and/or add to or change it, and get it passed, if the law is already in place elsewhere for your senators, reps, governors to review.

Valhalla is correct in you can't charge a person for a crime that was not a crime when they committed the act. The animal cruelty laws in Kansas were passed on the outcry of the puplic after several heinous acts to pets made the news. Like I said earlier enforcement is entirely another issue. Lenient sentencing by judge's whether people or pets is another issue as well.

rockhillmanor wrote:

valhalla360 wrote:
This sounds like

political grand-standing

more than anything else.

Yeah, it's on the books but I seriously doubt you are going to see

people getting locked up as a result.

I guess we will see first hand when this guy's sentencing hearing happens.

Not that I like what happened by any measure and he probably deserves some time treated like he did his pets but...

You can't change the laws after the fact to make something a crime.

Crowe wrote:
Animals are helpless.

I agree that they need a voice and I also know that serial killers and murderers often start out by killing/torturing animals but crimes against humans should be punished more severely. Children are helpless as well. IMHO to put humans and animals on the same level is wrong. We can only hope that this law gets enforced and is not used as a bargaining tool.

5 days ago two Tennessee men were charged with raping a 9 month old child and filming it. I think their punishment will be far worse then anyone caught molesting a dog. I don't see where anyone puts animal's on the same level as humans. I do believe in punishing people that are reprehensible members of society.

Animals are helpless.

I agree that they need a voice and I also know that serial killers and murderers often start out by killing/torturing animals but crimes against humans should be punished more severely. Children are helpless as well. IMHO to put humans and animals on the same level is wrong. We can only hope that this law gets enforced and is not used as a bargaining tool.

Crowe wrote:
Felony charges involve probation. PO officers are mandated to routinely do unannounced home checks on people on probation.

1. What happens when the probation is over? Usually isn't for life.
2. They may be mandated but one has to question if they are really being done.

I do find it sad that cruelty to animals has a worse penalty than7 cruelty to a human. They are not one and the same.

I find cruelty against humans and animal's both to be despicable. If you look up the BTK killer (Dennis Radar) you will find he got his jollies torturing animals before he moved on to humans. Several serial killers follow this same pattern. I would like to see these demented people caught and locked up before they move on to humans.

Crowe wrote:
How can anyone enforce a person not owning another animal? Is there some sort of national database these offenders go in to that town clerks tap into when you register your dog? Sounds completely unenforceable to me.

The same way virtually all laws are enforced, upon discovery of illegal activity. I hope you are not advocating not passing laws because it would be difficult to enforce. Post above mentions Probation Officers as witnesses. We could include neighbors and relatives as well. I would certainly report an incident if I had the knowledge. How about an animal abuser registry, much like sex offenders must use?
RichH

Crowe wrote:
I do find it sad that cruelty to animals has a worse penalty than cruelty to a human.

Animals are helpless.

Felony charges involve probation. PO officers are mandated to routinely do unannounced home checks on people on probation.

1. What happens when the probation is over? Usually isn't for life.
2. They may be mandated but one has to question if they are really being done.

I do find it sad that cruelty to animals has a worse penalty than cruelty to a human. They are not one and the same.

BCSnob wrote:
The new law will not apply to the one charged in the case that prompted the new law.

That's usually how it works.