โMar-30-2015 07:42 AM
โApr-03-2015 11:09 PM
โApr-03-2015 03:15 PM
pnichols wrote:Gdetrailer wrote:
You have a built in "regulator" (older alternators used a separate regulator which was often mounted near the battery), many newer alternators also communicate with the vehicles BCM (Body Control Module) and the BCM will control the alternator rotor current and has charging curves that it will follow.
Thanks for your long explanation on how altenators work. I already was aware of most of what you said as I used to be an EE before retirement.
However I'm not sure that I laid out any "misinformation" in my long post explaining what happens in my case - including what is implied and stated in Ford's published performance specifications for their V10 engine 130 amp alternator. Our motorhome came with twin coach batteries and I doubt that Winnebago would expect them to burnout/destroy/blow fuse links/whatever on the chassis alternator system under any conditions that these batteries might be in - including them being completely flat. Our Ford motorhome has a computer controlled 5-speed (6 speeds internally) TorqShift transmission, so most likely the altenator also has what you call a BCM to go along with the other computers on board. It's indeed keeping the alternator from over-heating under heavy current loads - probably as you say via control of rotor current - hence protecting it during recharge of low RV batteries ... as I would expect to be happening. By the way, our motorhome's engine has a huge radiator fan that of course does two things - it sucks air through the radiator to cool it and pushes air back onto the alternator to cool it. Just as a side point, our motorhome can continue to travel with a blown alternator .... just run the built-in generator when going down the road and tape the boost control "ON" so that the generator is supplying all engine current by means of the coach and starting battery being all connected together in direct parallel ... as Winnebago designed it.
Regarding flat vehicle batteries - I have throughout my life had some "flat" vehicle starting batteries and after jump starting the engine - let the engine idle for hours to bring the flat battery back up. This is even including 1950/1960's era engines with their vintage generators and alternators in cold Michigan winters. I'm of the opinion that modern alternators are capable of more than we think.
The marine community expects a lot out of their boat engine alternators all the time and I don't think that all of their marine engine alternators are necessarily the special marine versions with sophisticated battery charging circuits built in.
I doubt that ambulance packages include better technology alternators .... just maybe a bigger one, or maybe two instead of one, of the same type that came stock on my E450 chassis.
โApr-03-2015 03:00 PM
Naio wrote:
Wow, lots of good (and contradictory) information, on this page and the previous.
Naio wrote:
As for my electricity use: I don't heat food, make coffee, run a furnace or fridge, etc., on batteries. I use tent camping equipment for lights, food, etc.
โApr-03-2015 08:36 AM
NinerBikes wrote:John & Angela wrote:406 ft lbs, 240 HP, and only 5000 lbs of SUV that's AWD, all the time. My TT, dry weighs about the same, but I go easy on my motor and slow down going up hills, usually 40 to 45 MPH. It will go faster, but I don't like working the little motor that hard, I'd like 300,000 miles out of the drive train if I treat her right. Tongue weight and payload weights on the vehicle are what to watch out for.NinerBikes wrote:
Strange that my 2013 Touareg TDI diesel with a 3.0 liter motor and one battery has an alternator rated for 220 amps, maximum.
Those touaregs are amazing. A fellow hooked onto a 3800 pound trailer for a test pull yesterday, set the cruise at 90 KMH and went up what was probably a 6 grade hill and it just ignored the hill. Something like 400 pounds torque and 340 HP. Heck of a machine. Hitch weight was around 400, hardly dropped. Didn't even need an equalizer hitch.
It's a light diesel motor, so I treat it and run it accordingly, don't abuse it, and don't burn enough fuel to get the tranny and engine working too hard or too hot. I limit fuel consumption rate in the instant mpg reading in the dash to a max of 4.5 to 5 gallons of fuel burned an hour, when going up hill. If I am showing 10 MPG instant mpg, I'm keeping it at 45 mph or less for speed, if the grade is that steep. If it drops off to 8 mpg, 35 MPH up hill is all I do. Making heat and not being able to get rid of it is the enemy of these VW products. Again, they are light diesel motors. Only a fool uses cruise control on a vehicle like this going up hills and grades. Poor practice when trailering, operator needs to be more proactive and less lazy.
Porsche with it's Cayenne, and VW with the Touareg split the development costs in designing this SUV platform that is shared between the two brands. It was built originally for Europeans to tow their Caravans (TT in North American speak) to the Alps to go summer camping. Americans now are coming around to using them here for the same purpose. I believe in 2014, ALL Touaregs came with a 7700# rated hitch and tow package, in the USA. It was no longer an option.
โApr-03-2015 08:05 AM
John & Angela wrote:406 ft lbs, 240 HP, and only 5000 lbs of SUV that's AWD, all the time. My TT, dry weighs about the same, but I go easy on my motor and slow down going up hills, usually 40 to 45 MPH. It will go faster, but I don't like working the little motor that hard, I'd like 300,000 miles out of the drive train if I treat her right. Tongue weight and payload weights on the vehicle are what to watch out for.NinerBikes wrote:
Strange that my 2013 Touareg TDI diesel with a 3.0 liter motor and one battery has an alternator rated for 220 amps, maximum.
Those touaregs are amazing. A fellow hooked onto a 3800 pound trailer for a test pull yesterday, set the cruise at 90 KMH and went up what was probably a 6 grade hill and it just ignored the hill. Something like 400 pounds torque and 340 HP. Heck of a machine. Hitch weight was around 400, hardly dropped. Didn't even need an equalizer hitch.
โApr-03-2015 06:06 AM
NinerBikes wrote:
Strange that my 2013 Touareg TDI diesel with a 3.0 liter motor and one battery has an alternator rated for 220 amps, maximum.
โApr-02-2015 07:33 PM
โApr-02-2015 07:13 PM
โApr-02-2015 07:01 PM
Gdetrailer wrote:
You have a built in "regulator" (older alternators used a separate regulator which was often mounted near the battery), many newer alternators also communicate with the vehicles BCM (Body Control Module) and the BCM will control the alternator rotor current and has charging curves that it will follow.
โApr-02-2015 05:27 PM
โApr-02-2015 03:38 PM
NinerBikes wrote:
...change out all your light bulbs to lcd lights, to use less battery and conserve more amps, daily.
โApr-02-2015 03:28 PM
pnichols wrote:
I don't understand all this talk about being hard on vehicle alternators. Aren't they protected from burn-out regardless of how they're used?
It sure seems to me that's the way that they coulda/shoulda been designed in the first place. I assume that my RV's Ford 130 amp alternator can supply - if I spin it at high enough engine RPM - somehwere around 130 amps as long as I want it to, or until it's temperature protection and/or amperage protection kicks in .... whichever comes first. What am I missing here? :h
Per my Ford alternator's RPM versus amperage output curve, it can deliver around 60-70 amps at true engine idle. I assume it can do this forever, as the footnotes at the bottom of the curve say nothing about "intermittent use only".
Maybe alternators in the good old days could be burnt out - but modern ones have adequate protection? I can't anyway anyhow wrap my brain around being able to out smart the built in over-temperatue and/or over-current protection electronics in modern vehicle alternators.
Regarding long term idling of late model V8 and V10 engines .... I believe that Ford based (and probably Chevy based) ambulances and other emergency vehicles sit idling for hours at incident sites. And also, how about police cruisers .... they sit idling for hours along roads even in extreme heat with their air conditioners running, don't they?
โApr-02-2015 02:35 PM
โApr-02-2015 02:27 PM
Almot wrote:landyacht318 wrote:
... she won't be installing solar on her roof by herself. The labor to do this job, and how most paid installers do halfass jobs using halfassed wiring, is not a desirable route, though Solar itself is great at silently getting 80% batteries up and near to 100%, a job the alternator is Not good at, and neither is a grid powered charger hooked to a generator or a MSW inverter.
Installers are getting better, there is more of them to choose from. Even with the most stupid and lazy laborer there is an option to make them do it YOUR way, and this is what I would do if I were the OP. Do you research, ask, order most crucial parts and specify how it needs to be done - what panels, controller, panel mounts, wire gauge. Then just be there. Not much different from dealing with contractors in Mexico - you have to be there or they won't work or won't do it right (I would say, in Mexico almost never they would do it โrightโ because have no right tools or knowledge how to use it). Usually solar installers won't argue and will do what you tell them to.
So far I've heard of only one source for quality solar installers - www.amsolar.com. Some of their contractors are mobile, traveling all over. I don't endorse this company and didnโt buy any parts from them. Shop around for parts.
For DIY ideas, you can browse The list of completed projects
The very first link on the List is by Sleepy - on a small motorhome. Old post, panels are cheaper now and people install more and larger panels. As I see, the only time she needed help was to lift panels on the roof.
Yes, solar will often charge to 80% and near 100%.
Yes, solar does does a better yet job of charging โfromโ 80% to 100%, because these last 20% are slow, no matter what charging source, and itโs better to let solar do this after initial boost by generator or engine in the morning than running a generator for another 3-4 hours.
Yes, solar can charge from 50% to 100% as well. Energy conservation is the key, especially with a small solar. If you can make your coffee on propane, and reheat leftovers also on propane, a 200-300W solar in the South in winter will charge to 100% most of the time.
One other power hog is a furnace. Some people chose to replace it with Olympian catalytic heater from Amazon - those are non-vented, but apparently it works. I'm trying to get a vented cat heater for over 6 months now, from the only company that makes it, and am losing my patience already. But, with plenty of sun and nights above freezing, a furnace could still fit in the solar "energy budget".
Yes, bigger battery bank is important for off-grid, especially while on solar. Because you need to be able to ride through bad weather days. There aren't too many bad days in snowbirds destinations, but you still need to store at least 1.5 days supply. Which means - you need to do you "energy audit" - determine know how much you typically draw. Many people don't know. And - whether you can minimize this draw - a lot of people can't or don't want to.
If increased battery bank requires AGM due to space considerations - then get AGM, why not? They don't release fumes and can be mounted inside. Only Lifeline brand of AGM has very high charging rate, all other brands typically state that you should not exceed 0.3C charging rate, and this is about the same rate as with flooded. I recall reading 0.2-0.3C "recommended" rate in the manual of popular Troyan flooded batteries.