โJun-26-2013 07:21 AM
โJun-26-2013 05:59 PM
โJun-26-2013 01:22 PM
landyacht318 wrote:
My solar contributes to the alternator's amps up until the house batteries reach 14.5.
My solar is programmed to hold 14.5 for 90 minutes, yet my vehicles voltage regulator likes to prematurely drop back to 13.7.
After the vehicles voltage regulator decides 13.7 is plenty, and if the solar has not seen 90 minutes at 14.5, then the solar then contributes again, and several times I have seen the solar actually powering a portion of the vehicles electrical demands.
But in general it makes little difference. I like quenching my depleted house batteries with 60+ alternator amps in the morning, even if short lived. They seem to like it.
This time of year I often don't even bother bringing the alternator into the house battery loop.
I like how quickly my engine starts when 3 batteries are cranking the starter, but I don't want the fridge compressor to be running when I crank the starter with assist from the house batteries. With my manual switch, I feel safer just leaving the 2 banks separate.
โJun-26-2013 12:03 PM
handye9 wrote:
I have two of these.
This is the controller I use.
Battery bank is two 12 volt group 24.
When towing, I don't know how a person would tell how much power was coming from solar and how much was coming from tow vehicle, unless the tow vehicle provided no charging at all.
Length of time a person could expect for boodocking, depends on power usage, hours of sunlight, angle of sunlight, size (and condition) of battery bank, size and type of panels, type of controller, and wire size used to hook it up.
All my interior and exterior lights are LED, and my television is (low watt) 12 volt. No inverter to run any 120 volt appliances. We have boondocked for up to 5 days, with no noticeable drop in battery power. The solar panels kept up with a couple hours (daily) lights and television, and, all the parasitic draws from gas detector, refridgerator, etc.
I also have a panel on my TC. It is a single 135 watt with PWM controller.
Just out of curiosity, one sunny day, I disconnected the battery and connected the cables from the controller, directly to the converter. I was able to watch television and turn on a couple lights (also LED), with nothing but solar power.
โJun-26-2013 11:05 AM
โJun-26-2013 11:00 AM
โJun-26-2013 10:45 AM
MrWizard wrote:
i have the blue sky 2000e
one my best days solar was on a drive back to LA from San Diego in july of 2011
'air cooling' from the moving air , on shore breeze no smog no clouds
an the alternator, seems a little low according to my digital at the dash
13.6v
need to check it at the batteries with engine running
โJun-26-2013 10:40 AM
SteveAE wrote:
A lot in my case.
I have never data logged it, but I know for a fact that before I installed solar, my batteries wouldn't fully charge while traveling. After adding the solar, they are always fully charged early in the day. My panels (300 watts) are flat on the roof. Solar charging while traveling is such an under considered reason for adding it.
Steve
โJun-26-2013 10:39 AM
smkettner wrote:
Enough to run my 2-way fridge on electric through an inverter.
So at least 28 amps. OK maybe some comes from the truck but I don't think very much.
I would expect better performance when rolling as the 60 mph breeze will help cool the panels.
โJun-26-2013 10:17 AM
โJun-26-2013 09:05 AM
โJun-26-2013 08:58 AM
โJun-26-2013 08:17 AM
HiTech wrote:
Because of shadows from semis, buildings, bridges...etc hitting the PVs, and because of less tree cover. Also because of rapidly changing direction of illumination and most likely little tilt. But especially the very rapidly changing illumination/shadow pattern, and what different controllers might make of it. Many factors. If you look at the solar race cars, they have much more advanced control strategies than most stationary charge controllers.
I imagine PWM would run effectively the same.
But I am curious in what people here actually observe with their set ups.
Jim
โJun-26-2013 08:08 AM
โJun-26-2013 08:01 AM