โApr-22-2017 11:49 AM
โApr-24-2017 03:22 PM
2oldman wrote:
...
I found there's less battery heating and better efficiency. Trying to run air on 12v was scary- lots of heating in all components. 24v was better, but 48 is a piece of cake. The less amps you can deal with the better.
I think as the conversion difference is smaller, the efficiency is better. Although I will add that the idle current for my 4k 48v inverter is much more (although still insignificant) than a 12v unit.
โApr-24-2017 10:51 AM
brulaz wrote:Correct.. I was harkening back to my 12v days. You'd need 12v batteries to make 6 work.
EDIT: Especially as 6 GC2s won't work with 24V.
So there could be more Peukert's, battery heating and conversion inefficiencies as well.
โApr-23-2017 10:21 AM
2oldman wrote:brulaz wrote:I found that 6 GCs was a sweet spot for charging vs usage for that size inverter.
But I'm a bit worried about what will happen now, with the new 2000W Inverter.
โApr-23-2017 10:09 AM
BFL13 wrote:
What is the composition of the 700w of solar? I missed that somewhere.
If it is using 24v 60 cell panels the highest voltage you will get is 30v, based on my testing with 24v battery bank and a 60 cell panel. Doesn't matter what the MPPT controller can do as such, it is the 60 cell panel limit. 30v is plenty for recharging, but not enough to equalize.
You are ok to get to equalize levels with 24v 72 cell panels or using 12v 36s in series to be 24v.
โApr-23-2017 09:25 AM
brulaz wrote:I found that 6 GCs was a sweet spot for charging vs usage for that size inverter. You better be using more power!
But I'm a bit worried about what will happen now, with the new 2000W Inverter.
โApr-23-2017 07:23 AM
โApr-22-2017 07:35 PM
colorado.com wrote:
As the highest paved road in North America, Mount Evans Road rises to a height of 14,130 feet above sea level
โApr-22-2017 07:29 PM
2oldman wrote:
Good thinking on the 24 v 12 charging. 700w should easily handle 2 batteries (2- right?).
โApr-22-2017 06:31 PM
time2roll wrote:Well that *is* weird.
Operating Altitude Up to 9,843ft (3000m) above sea level
โApr-22-2017 06:14 PM
โApr-22-2017 06:11 PM
time2roll wrote:My control-F search found no reference to elevation in the first post's link. The capacitors blow up?
Specification sheet mentions the max elevation.
โApr-22-2017 06:08 PM
โApr-22-2017 06:05 PM
โApr-22-2017 05:08 PM
MrWizard wrote:Specification sheet mentions the max elevation.time2roll wrote:
I like the no load draw and the tight load sense ratings.
What happens above 10,000 feet elevation?
is NOT A GENERATOR no carb no oxygen use, NO FUEL, NO worry