DSchmidt_2000 wrote:
yep, I know this. But why would runtime be less above 1300W with ECO mode ON as per this guys data?
Do you mean less than with eco off, or less than below 1300w?
Perhaps the data is flawed?
I didn't study the numbers you posted closely. That mystery column first of all doesn't look right. Then there is the column headings which don't seem to make proper sense in relation to the numbers in the columns. All in all, it looked muddled to me so I just glanced at it and moved on.
I do know that with my Honeywell, filling from a gas can is imprecise. If I filled it from the gas pump, then 1.5g is 1.5g. But filling from a gas can, a few ounces one way or the other makes a pretty big difference in run time.
That's just one example of possible experimental imprecision. Not knowing the exact structure of the experiment, how could I know exactly how (or if) they screwed it up?
If there is a discrepancy in the data which doesn't make sense, then it's quite possible the data is flawed.
