โJan-15-2019 09:17 PM
โJan-19-2019 11:40 AM
Wild Card wrote:gmcsmoke wrote:Wild Card wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
OK all you knowledgable people WHY have we not heard about CP4.2 pump failures like we used to??????
All mfg have upped the fuel filtration systems. The CP4.2 does not like any moisture. All diesel fuel contains some moisture and contaminants.
Higher pressure pumps simply can not handle contaminated fuel. You cant fix the fuel problem so you must be able to treat the fuel problem.
yeah well what about all the 2011-2013's driving around with OEM filtration for that MY? where's the catastrophic failures?
I am not going to answer it for you but a simple Google search will find your answer.
โJan-18-2019 06:11 PM
gmcsmoke wrote:Wild Card wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
OK all you knowledgable people WHY have we not heard about CP4.2 pump failures like we used to??????
All mfg have upped the fuel filtration systems. The CP4.2 does not like any moisture. All diesel fuel contains some moisture and contaminants.
Higher pressure pumps simply can not handle contaminated fuel. You cant fix the fuel problem so you must be able to treat the fuel problem.
yeah well what about all the 2011-2013's driving around with OEM filtration for that MY? where's the catastrophic failures?
โJan-18-2019 06:06 PM
Me Again wrote:
All three of my Ram trucks were taco born, believe. Can not really confirm that on the 93.
โJan-18-2019 05:44 PM
โJan-18-2019 04:54 PM
Cummins12V98 wrote:
I donโt think I have ever said I wonโt buy one but I never liked how people were denied coverage. I would not hesitate to buy a 2020. The good far outweighs the bad owning. RAM.
โJan-18-2019 04:06 PM
Bigfoot affair wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
I donโt think I have ever said I wonโt buy one but I never liked how people were denied coverage. I would not hesitate to buy a 2020. The good far outweighs the bad owning. RAM.
2020, even if they don't move production back to the USA?
โJan-18-2019 03:10 PM
Wild Card wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
OK all you knowledgable people WHY have we not heard about CP4.2 pump failures like we used to??????
All mfg have upped the fuel filtration systems. The CP4.2 does not like any moisture. All diesel fuel contains some moisture and contaminants.
Higher pressure pumps simply can not handle contaminated fuel. You cant fix the fuel problem so you must be able to treat the fuel problem.
โJan-18-2019 02:17 PM
Cummins12V98 wrote:
I donโt think I have ever said I wonโt buy one but I never liked how people were denied coverage. I would not hesitate to buy a 2020. The good far outweighs the bad owning. RAM.
โJan-18-2019 01:56 PM
โJan-18-2019 01:05 PM
Me Again wrote:Bigfoot affair wrote:Me Again wrote:
The failures of the early CP4's both 1 and 2's was the piston with a roller follower getting turned sideways to the pumps cam lobe. Bosch was unwilling to pay the holder of a patent to keep the piston from turning in the bore.
The Metal that contaminate the fuel system was from the roller and cam lobe.
They have been working to fix the issue.
This page shows a picture of a damaged roller. Fig 3
https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2017/32/matecconf_icce2017_00020.pdf
This may be the Edelbrock patent that Bosch was unwilling to pay royalties to use.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6473964B1/en
What do you consider early pumps?
2016 Ecodiesel cp4.2 failure Clicky
2016 Duramax cp4.2 failure clicky
2016 Powerstroke cp4.2 failure clicky
I could waste half the day posting this ****, they haven't made any changes to the pump to prevent the piston from turning in the bore...
Unless, Cummins installed a failure disaster device to save the rest of the fuel system... Aftermarket has them out for the Powerstroke Disaster prevention
Fuel contamination can lead to the piston in the bore. Ford had little or no WIF detection, which put them on the front page of the issue. And NO I WOULD NOT buy a truck with a CP4.
โJan-18-2019 11:51 AM
Bigfoot affair wrote:Me Again wrote:
The failures of the early CP4's both 1 and 2's was the piston with a roller follower getting turned sideways to the pumps cam lobe. Bosch was unwilling to pay the holder of a patent to keep the piston from turning in the bore.
The Metal that contaminate the fuel system was from the roller and cam lobe.
They have been working to fix the issue.
This page shows a picture of a damaged roller. Fig 3
https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2017/32/matecconf_icce2017_00020.pdf
This may be the Edelbrock patent that Bosch was unwilling to pay royalties to use.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6473964B1/en
What do you consider early pumps?
2016 Ecodiesel cp4.2 failure Clicky
2016 Duramax cp4.2 failure clicky
2016 Powerstroke cp4.2 failure clicky
I could waste half the day posting this ****, they haven't made any changes to the pump to prevent the piston from turning in the bore...
Unless, Cummins installed a failure disaster device to save the rest of the fuel system... Aftermarket has them out for the Powerstroke Disaster prevention
โJan-18-2019 11:16 AM
โJan-18-2019 11:12 AM
Me Again wrote:
The failures of the early CP4's both 1 and 2's was the piston with a roller follower getting turned sideways to the pumps cam lobe. Bosch was unwilling to pay the holder of a patent to keep the piston from turning in the bore.
The Metal that contaminate the fuel system was from the roller and cam lobe.
They have been working to fix the issue.
This page shows a picture of a damaged roller. Fig 3
https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2017/32/matecconf_icce2017_00020.pdf
This may be the Edelbrock patent that Bosch was unwilling to pay royalties to use.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6473964B1/en
โJan-18-2019 10:00 AM
โJan-18-2019 09:12 AM
Huntindog wrote:Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:The .1 is single piston (used in smaller motors such as the VW) and the .2 is a 2 piston for larger motors such as the GM/Ford, and now Ram HDs. The .2 IS NOT a revised pump... Just a 2 cylinder pump.Bigfoot affair wrote:
LOL, you are wrong!
The .2 doesn't mean revision, it means that it is a two piston pump. CP4.1 one piston, CP4.2 two piston.
Yes, internet is full of CP4.1 and CP4.2 failures, I think you already know but just choose to think its ok because Ram/Cummins is now using it... unreal!
I have not heard of anyone having any problems with the .2 pumps. I have one in my Ecodiesel and it is in Ford and GM diesels. When Ford came out with the 6.7 PS both Ford and GM had many CP 4.1 pumps fail.
Then Bosch went to the CP 4.2 and no more failures. At least not like we where seeing with the .1 pumps. Are there .2 failures, yes but nothing near what the .1 pumps where failing.
The difference is Ford flat out refused to protect their customers and GM stepped up and warrantied their trucks.
I would not think twice about buying a diesel with the CP 4.2 pump no mater the maker.
Don
They all have catastrophic failures that cost about 10K to repair.
GM quit using them around 2017. They paid out a LOT in warranty claims. For did not pay out so much, as they denied a lot of claims. They still use the CP4.2.