GrandpaKip,
Your post says/reveals the very same thing/results we have experienced including MPG's towing our flat with rounded corners 6 X 10 X 6' high inside enclosed trailer and our 6 X 12+ the front Vee floor length X 6' high inside 90 degree Vee nosed enclosed trailer behind the same '05 I-6 Chevy Trailblazer with the same GVW (3200-3300 lbs) on the same road trips and same speeds. The only difference was the Vee nose vs flat front on the trailer. Thus, the aerodynamic efficiency effect.
I'm a retired automotive engineer having owned a engineering operation for nearly 40 years and already knew approx what the difference should have been by calculations, and it was! It's a fact not a fantasy!
FWIW: A smoothly covered trailer underbelly also creates much less turbulence and air drag than an un-enclosed trailer underbelly because each crossmember is like dragging it flat ways to/thru the wind and creates lots of turbulence and when added together, they really count up in air drag! Obviously, neither of our enclosed cargo trailers had enclosed underbellies.