โJun-28-2019 02:58 PM
โJun-29-2019 08:34 PM
โJun-29-2019 02:52 PM
โJun-29-2019 02:51 PM
GordonThree wrote:
I don't think there's enough market pressure yet to dramatically advance batteries or fuel cells.
The spectre of running out of fossil fuels keeps getting pushed back by new extraction technology and improved simulations to find the reserves.
โJun-29-2019 02:35 PM
โJun-29-2019 10:31 AM
โJun-29-2019 08:02 AM
โJun-29-2019 07:32 AM
NRALIFR wrote:
The premise of the โMr. Fusionโ device was that it used cold fusion to produce power. Cold fusion is a hypothetical source of nuclear power that would occur at or near room temperature. Itโs been pretty much cast out by the scientific establishment.
The Hydrogenics fuel cells are an alternative energy technology that generate electric energy through the reaction between hydrogen (or a hydrogen-rich fuel source) and oxygen. These devices are particularly interesting due to high efficiencies relative to traditional combustion engines and low emissions, producing only heat and water as waste products.
I personally feel that technologies such as these are more promising than any advances in battery technologies weโre likely to see.
:):)
โJun-29-2019 07:25 AM
โJun-29-2019 07:22 AM
โJun-29-2019 07:14 AM
GordonThree wrote:Reisender wrote:NRALIFR wrote:
I agree. Battery technology, with its weight, range limits, environmental impact, and recharging requirements is holding back the adoption of electric vehicles. Until EVโs have a source of power that doesnโt just shift the load onto the electrical grid, they will just be a virtue signaling badge of honor for early adopters.
What will ultimately be needed for EVโs to become viable for everyone across the board is the equivalent of this:
I know little about this stuff but where would the power come from.
Casimir effect, quantum vacuum, zero point energy. Space-time itself will be the "fuel"
โJun-29-2019 07:10 AM
Reisender wrote:NRALIFR wrote:
I agree. Battery technology, with its weight, range limits, environmental impact, and recharging requirements is holding back the adoption of electric vehicles. Until EVโs have a source of power that doesnโt just shift the load onto the electrical grid, they will just be a virtue signaling badge of honor for early adopters.
What will ultimately be needed for EVโs to become viable for everyone across the board is the equivalent of this:
I know little about this stuff but where would the power come from.
โJun-29-2019 05:25 AM
NRALIFR wrote:
I agree. Battery technology, with its weight, range limits, environmental impact, and recharging requirements is holding back the adoption of electric vehicles. Until EVโs have a source of power that doesnโt just shift the load onto the electrical grid, they will just be a virtue signaling badge of honor for early adopters.
What will ultimately be needed for EVโs to become viable for everyone across the board is the equivalent of this:
What it will look like is pure conjecture, but IMHO it WILL have these attributes:
Small compact size
Low weight
Energy output instantly variable from zero to xxxx (<- a very high number)
Fuel source readily available without depending on the electrical power grid
Most importantly: it will be a power PRODUCING device, not a power STORAGE device.
:):)
โJun-29-2019 03:47 AM
โJun-28-2019 05:22 PM