cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Cummins Buying Fuel Cell Company - Hydrogenics

ShinerBock
Explorer
Explorer
With this and other acquisitions mentioned in the article, Cummins seems to be positioning themselves as a fuel cell powertrain leader. This is where most in the medium and heavy world, myself included, see the industry going, not BEV's.


Cummins Buying Fuel Cell Company - Hydrogenics
2014 Ram 2500 6.7L CTD
2016 BMW 2.0L diesel (work and back car)
2023 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.0L Ecodiesel

Highland Ridge Silverstar 378RBS
14 REPLIES 14

dewey02
Explorer II
Explorer II


1.21 Gigawatts???? ๐Ÿ˜‰

JRscooby
Explorer II
Explorer II
hamnit

JRscooby
Explorer II
Explorer II
GordonThree wrote:
I don't think there's enough market pressure yet to dramatically advance batteries or fuel cells.

The spectre of running out of fossil fuels keeps getting pushed back by new extraction technology and improved simulations to find the reserves.


But a big spill into the Mississippi river could change the dates...

BenK
Explorer
Explorer
Agree with Shiner, fuel cells are way better than BEV's...but...

Hydrogen tank will always be an issue...until they figure out HOW2 manage liquid hydrogen. Bot at the generation/transport/storage/delivery and in-vehicle tank

Hydrogen in gaseous form will not have the range and/or the tank will be very large

Got laid off and my two skunk works teams at SunLabs, we were working on our invention...a solid state AC compressor with no moving parts, except for an automotive 1-way valve so the assembly would pump liquid nitrogen

Our target was super computing and super conductors in a cryogenic system. Fuel cells was at the bottom of the list

As the Program manager and inventor of some of that stuff, the heat to vaporize liquid hydrogen would be the passenger compartment AC system. Safety issues abounded as hydrogen in the cabin would not pass any safety requirements, but engineering is all about solving problems...
-Ben Picture of my rig
1996 GMC SLT Suburban 3/4 ton K3500/7.4L/4:1/+150Kmiles orig owner...
1980 Chevy Silverado C10/long bed/"BUILT" 5.7L/3:73/1 ton helper springs/+329Kmiles, bought it from dad...
1998 Mazda B2500 (1/2 ton) pickup, 2nd owner...
Praise Dyno Brake equiped and all have "nose bleed" braking!
Previous trucks/offroaders: 40's Jeep restored in mid 60's / 69 DuneBuggy (approx +1K lb: VW pan/200hpCorvair: eng, cam, dual carb'w velocity stacks'n 18" runners, 4spd transaxle) made myself from ground up / 1970 Toyota FJ40 / 1973 K5 Blazer (2dr Tahoe, 1 ton axles front/rear, +255K miles when sold it)...
Sold the boat (looking for another): Trophy with twin 150's...
51 cylinders in household, what's yours?...

GordonThree
Explorer
Explorer
I don't think there's enough market pressure yet to dramatically advance batteries or fuel cells.

The spectre of running out of fossil fuels keeps getting pushed back by new extraction technology and improved simulations to find the reserves.
2013 KZ Sportsmen Classic 200, 20 ft TT
2020 RAM 1500, 5.7 4x4, 8 speed

ShinerBock
Explorer
Explorer
Wow, this went into a whole other realm that I did not think it would. Not complaining, just surprised.
2014 Ram 2500 6.7L CTD
2016 BMW 2.0L diesel (work and back car)
2023 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.0L Ecodiesel

Highland Ridge Silverstar 378RBS

Reisender
Nomad
Nomad
NRALIFR wrote:
The premise of the โ€œMr. Fusionโ€ device was that it used cold fusion to produce power. Cold fusion is a hypothetical source of nuclear power that would occur at or near room temperature. Itโ€™s been pretty much cast out by the scientific establishment.

The Hydrogenics fuel cells are an alternative energy technology that generate electric energy through the reaction between hydrogen (or a hydrogen-rich fuel source) and oxygen. These devices are particularly interesting due to high efficiencies relative to traditional combustion engines and low emissions, producing only heat and water as waste products.

I personally feel that technologies such as these are more promising than any advances in battery technologies weโ€™re likely to see.

:):)


I think that there may be significant EV penetration by the time some of these technologies mature. At that point whatever replaces EV will have to be home fuelable as people will be very used to home fueling at not having to go to any kind of fuel outlet. Iโ€™m sure itโ€™s doable but will still probably use grid energy to produce it.

Interesting topic though.

NRALIFR
Explorer
Explorer
The premise of the โ€œMr. Fusionโ€ device was that it used cold fusion to produce power. Cold fusion is a hypothetical source of nuclear power that would occur at or near room temperature. Itโ€™s been pretty much cast out by the scientific establishment.

The Hydrogenics fuel cells are an alternative energy technology that generate electric energy through the reaction between hydrogen (or a hydrogen-rich fuel source) and oxygen. These devices are particularly interesting due to high efficiencies relative to traditional combustion engines and low emissions, producing only heat and water as waste products.

I personally feel that technologies such as these are more promising than any advances in battery technologies weโ€™re likely to see.

:):)
2001 Lance 1121 on a 2016 F450 โ€˜Scuse me while I whinge.
And for all you Scooby-Doo and Yosemite Sam typesโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..Letโ€™s Go Brandon!!!

GordonThree
Explorer
Explorer
Casimir effect harnessed

Baby steps. Something powerful enough to run an EV or house is a long ways off.
2013 KZ Sportsmen Classic 200, 20 ft TT
2020 RAM 1500, 5.7 4x4, 8 speed

Reisender
Nomad
Nomad
GordonThree wrote:
Reisender wrote:
NRALIFR wrote:
I agree. Battery technology, with its weight, range limits, environmental impact, and recharging requirements is holding back the adoption of electric vehicles. Until EVโ€™s have a source of power that doesnโ€™t just shift the load onto the electrical grid, they will just be a virtue signaling badge of honor for early adopters.

What will ultimately be needed for EVโ€™s to become viable for everyone across the board is the equivalent of this:



I know little about this stuff but where would the power come from.


Casimir effect, quantum vacuum, zero point energy. Space-time itself will be the "fuel"


Lol. ๐Ÿ™‚

GordonThree
Explorer
Explorer
Reisender wrote:
NRALIFR wrote:
I agree. Battery technology, with its weight, range limits, environmental impact, and recharging requirements is holding back the adoption of electric vehicles. Until EVโ€™s have a source of power that doesnโ€™t just shift the load onto the electrical grid, they will just be a virtue signaling badge of honor for early adopters.

What will ultimately be needed for EVโ€™s to become viable for everyone across the board is the equivalent of this:



I know little about this stuff but where would the power come from.


Casimir effect, quantum vacuum, zero point energy. Space-time itself will be the "fuel"
2013 KZ Sportsmen Classic 200, 20 ft TT
2020 RAM 1500, 5.7 4x4, 8 speed

Reisender
Nomad
Nomad
NRALIFR wrote:
I agree. Battery technology, with its weight, range limits, environmental impact, and recharging requirements is holding back the adoption of electric vehicles. Until EVโ€™s have a source of power that doesnโ€™t just shift the load onto the electrical grid, they will just be a virtue signaling badge of honor for early adopters.

What will ultimately be needed for EVโ€™s to become viable for everyone across the board is the equivalent of this:



What it will look like is pure conjecture, but IMHO it WILL have these attributes:

Small compact size
Low weight
Energy output instantly variable from zero to xxxx (<- a very high number)
Fuel source readily available without depending on the electrical power grid
Most importantly: it will be a power PRODUCING device, not a power STORAGE device.

:):)


I know little about this stuff but where would the power come from.

NRALIFR
Explorer
Explorer
I agree. Battery technology, with its weight, range limits, environmental impact, and recharging requirements is holding back the adoption of electric vehicles. Until EVโ€™s have a source of power that doesnโ€™t just shift the load onto the electrical grid, they will just be a virtue signaling badge of honor for early adopters.

What will ultimately be needed for EVโ€™s to become viable for everyone across the board is the equivalent of this:



What it will look like is pure conjecture, but IMHO it WILL have these attributes:

Small compact size
Low weight
Energy output instantly variable from zero to xxxx (<- a very high number)
Fuel source readily available without depending on the electrical power grid
Most importantly: it will be a power PRODUCING device, not a power STORAGE device.

:):)
2001 Lance 1121 on a 2016 F450 โ€˜Scuse me while I whinge.
And for all you Scooby-Doo and Yosemite Sam typesโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..Letโ€™s Go Brandon!!!

Lwiddis
Explorer II
Explorer II
โ€œIt is a great honor to be associated with such distinguished companies as Cummins and Air Liquide.โ€

And the employment contract and golden parachute offered by Cummings? Letโ€™s see in five years if Cummins is making any money for its $290 million.
Winnebago 2101DS TT & 2022 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71, WindyNation 300 watt solar-Lossigy 200 AH Lithium battery. Prefer boondocking, USFS, COE, BLM, NPS, TVA, state camps. Bicyclist. 14 yr. Army -11B40 then 11A - (MOS 1542 & 1560) IOBC & IOAC grad