โJun-21-2004 09:12 PM
We are getting closer to answers I am looking for etc.
โNov-03-2006 11:48 AM
โNov-03-2006 10:43 AM
โNov-03-2006 09:41 AM
โNov-02-2006 07:40 PM
Sport45 wrote:
A diesel pulling a load at speed does the same work as a gas engine pulling the same load at the same speed. Engine rpm has nothing to do with the "work" done. This logic would indicate you could replace your gears with a 2.75:1 set, slow your diesel down, do less work and last even longer.
Diesel has more Btu's per gallon, but the real effeciency killer in the gasoline engine is the throttle plate. Engines are air pumps and having to draw vacuum against the throttle to control power saps energy.
Solid proof? If you're driving an 18-wheeler I guess this is a good comparison. Otherwise it's just ancedotal information. The space shuttle runs on liquid hydrogen, that doesn't make it a good fuel for your typical 737. Look at all the freight pulled by diesel-electric trains. Should we all go diesel-electric? That's probably the best use of a diesel engine I know of. The engine is designed and operates at a set rpm. The rpm never changes, only the load.
90% or more of the vehicles on the road now are transverse engine front wheel drive. Is this solid proof that it would be the best drive system for a pickup?
Diesels have their place. They are a very good fit for over-the-road tractors, large boats, construction machinery, and the military. In 1/2 to 1-ton pickups it's a very grey area. Everyone has their own criteria and sometimes gasoline power is the best fit.
If you have the money to buy and own a diesel because it sounds cool, go for it!
โNov-02-2006 03:29 PM
โNov-02-2006 03:16 PM
Sport45 wrote:
Diesels have their place. They are a very good fit for over-the-road tractors, large boats, construction machinery, and the military. In 1/2 to 1-ton pickups it's a very grey area. Everyone has their own criteria and sometimes gasoline power is the best fit.
If you have the money to buy and own a diesel because it sounds cool, go for it!
โNov-02-2006 06:45 AM
DavidPhillips wrote:
More torque at lower rpm means easier towing and the engine is not working as hard and will last much longer.
Fuel usage is relative to power here. More BTU's in diesel. Plain and simple.
Need some solid proof?
Look at the vehicles on the road. Trucks that are hauling are all diesel.
You do not see any gas powered semi trucks. These companies are in the business to haul for money and use what makes money.
โOct-31-2006 12:44 PM
โOct-30-2006 10:52 AM
Steak2k1 wrote:
Well: All I can say is that a couple of guys have told me they get close to 30 mpg...on a CTD. speed used..?? I do not know. All heresay of course. I do not own one but am seriously looking at it.
I would love to hear and read of some actual mileage (non-towing) with the Cummins diesel and for that matter the Power Stroke and the Duramax..
ANYONE..??
โOct-30-2006 09:21 AM
Steak2k1 wrote:
Well: All I can say is that a couple of guys have told me they get close to 30 mpg...on a CTD. speed used..?? I do not know. All heresay of course. I do not own one but am seriously looking at it.
I would love to hear and read of some actual mileage (non-towing) with the Cummins diesel and for that matter the Power Stroke and the Duramax..
ANYONE..??
โOct-30-2006 04:40 AM
โOct-29-2006 07:12 PM
'06 GMC DMax CCSB 594,545 km
(368,890 miles)
2003 Citation 26RKS
.โOct-27-2006 09:08 PM
โOct-27-2006 08:57 PM
โOct-27-2006 12:32 PM