cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Ford 7.3L GASSER!!

ib516
Explorer II
Explorer II
Big block baby!

VIDEO
Prev: 2010 Cougar 322QBS (junk)
02 Dodge 2500 4x4 5.9L CTD 3.55
07 Dodge 3500 4x4 SRW Mega 5.9L CTD 3.73
14 Ram 2500 4x4 Crew 6.4L Hemi 4.10
06 Chevy 1500 4x4 E-Cab 3.73 5.3L
07 Dodge 1500 5.7L Hemi 3.55 / 2010 Jayco 17z
All above are sold, no longer own an RV
74 REPLIES 74

Learjet
Explorer
Explorer
I will have to desalinate the salient points made above ^^^
2017 Ram Big Horn, DRW Long Box, 4x4, Cummins, Aisin, 3.73
2022 Jayco Pinnacle 32RLTS, Onan 5500, Disc Brakes, 17.5" tires
B&W Ram Companion

BigToe
Explorer
Explorer
ShinerBock wrote:
Interesting at 2:40 of the video that he is stating that the differences between the power numbers between the chassis dyno certification is almost identical to the engine dyno certification which means there will not be that much of a hp drop in the cab and chassis trucks due to the different emissions certifications.


I didn't hear Joel Beltramo, Chief Engineer of the upcoming Ford 7.3L gas engine say or even suggest what ShinerBlock heard above.

At 2:41 in the video, Mr Beltramo said that there WILL be "subtle changes for the chassis cert engines"... but that the "dyno cert engines are almost identical", and said this while he was talking about the value to fleets from an in house service training perspective of having an identical gas engine in all trucks in the fleet.

To understand this better, some may or may not understand the difference between chassis cert and dyno cert, and might mistakenly associate "chassis cert" as applying to "chassis cabs", when they are unrelated.

Chassis cert applies to F-250/350/450 pickups, because for EPA emissions certification purposes, these vehicles are final stage completed vehicles with a known body (pickup bed) installed, and therefore the entire chassis is certified.

Beltramo specifically said that "chassis cert" engines will have "subtle changes".

Dyno cert applies to the F-350/450/550/650/750 chassis cabs, that Ford sells as incomplete vehicles that have no bed body and have not entered into their final stage of manufacture. Therefore, for EPA emissions certification purposes, the emissions for these engines are dyno certified only, because the ultimate characteristics of the final vehicle are unknown and not determinable by Ford.

Beltramo said that "all dyno certs are almost identical".

THIS is the news... that there will be almost identical characteristics among the dyno cert engines throughout the chassis cab line up. He did NOT say that the chassis cabs (dyno cert) will be identical to the pickups (chassis cert). As specifically stated, the pickups (chassis cert) engines will have "subtle changes" from the chassis cab (dyno cert) engines.

In the last 7.3L (diesel) from 20 years ago, there was a big differences in the dyno certs for F-450/550 chassis cabs (235 hp) versus the dyno cert for the F-650/750 chassis cab (190 hp). In the outgoing 6.8L V10 gas engine that the upcoming 7.3L gas engine will replace, there are again fairly substantial differences between the F-450/550 dyno cert (288 hp) versus the F-650 dyno cert (320 hp).


If one listens carefully to what Joel Beltramo actually said, the difference will be more clear.

ScottG
Nomad
Nomad
MikeRP wrote:
Iโ€™m thinking 425HP 475 ft-lbs. 2200 rpm on max torque.

Put your numbers in boys and girls.

Weโ€™ll see whoโ€™s closest. Lol


I'm going to say 476.!
JK!

I'm thinking 485.

Learjet
Explorer
Explorer
I had a 6.2 wasn't enough for me...my Cummins 6.7 awesome...but...I'll be looking hard at the 7.3 for the next one ๐Ÿ™‚
2017 Ram Big Horn, DRW Long Box, 4x4, Cummins, Aisin, 3.73
2022 Jayco Pinnacle 32RLTS, Onan 5500, Disc Brakes, 17.5" tires
B&W Ram Companion

goducks10
Explorer
Explorer
Iraqvet05 wrote:
$4200 option over the 6.2? That's half the cost of a 6.7 option.

$2500? Premium fuel?

parker_rowe
Explorer
Explorer
Iraqvet05 wrote:
$4200 option over the 6.2? That's half the cost of a 6.7 option.


That was just someones guess. Who knows what it it will be. The Ecoboost costs less than half that to add so I'm not sure it will be that expensive.

camperdave wrote:
I love that it's an iron blocked pushrod engine, and I'm sure it will be extremely powerful, but it's not even as big as the old 460 Ford used to have.

And what's with the 10 speeds? Is the powerband going to be that narrow?


Why be forced to downshift and go up 2000rpm when you can just go up 1000rpm and do the job?

Plus you can run super low first gears to get rolling and still have good gear spacing and multiple overdrives to choose from.
2015 Starcraft TravelStar 239TBS 6500 GVWR
1997 GMC Suburban K2500 7.4 Vortec/4.10
1977 Kawasaki KZ1000

ACZL
Explorer
Explorer
In the 90's, GM's 7.4 was a 454 and I think Ford's 7.? was a 460. Am I right? Granted they didn't have the numbers as they will today, but displacement wise....the same. What was GM's 8.1 back in early 2000???
2017 F350 DRW XLT, CC, 4x4, 6.7
2018 Big Country 3560 SS
"The best part of RVing and Snowmobiling is spending time with family and friends"
"Catin' in the Winter"

camperdave
Explorer
Explorer
I love that it's an iron blocked pushrod engine, and I'm sure it will be extremely powerful, but it's not even as big as the old 460 Ford used to have.

And what's with the 10 speeds? Is the powerband going to be that narrow?
2004 Fleetwood Tioga 29v

timmac
Explorer
Explorer
Something tells me the HP/Torque will be about the same as the 3 valve V-10..

Also I would not want the 1st or 2nd year of any new motor/transmission design, it took a few years for the V-10 to work out its issues.

Remember the spark plug blowing out issue.. :E

Big_Katuna
Explorer II
Explorer II
Now they just need to bring back the Crown Vic or Maurader and stick that motor in.

Thank the Lord for the big block Ford!
My Kharma ran over my Dogma.

kw_00
Explorer
Explorer
It will be a great engine, it looks like they borrowed some look and tech of the GM LS engines or just went back to the original design of their previous generation engine prior the Triton series. Regardless as Iโ€™m a so called fellow gear head, Iโ€™m loving the new gas engines. Canโ€™t wait to see them all pull the IKE. I also like the fact that Ford is using this engine in larger trucks. I hope GMs new LS engine 6.6 will be the same. Oh and they followed GMs 6 bolt mains, bravo Ford. Iโ€™m glad they have, makes for better structural integrity and longevity. This engine will and should be impressive.
A truck, a camper, a few toys, but most importantly a wonderful family.

Iraqvet05
Explorer
Explorer
$4200 option over the 6.2? That's half the cost of a 6.7 option.
2017 Ford F-250 6.2 gas
2018 Jayco 28BHBE

US Army veteran

dodge_guy
Explorer II
Explorer II
โ€œNot boosted, but itโ€™s ready for boost!โ€ What does that tell you!
Wife Kim
Son Brandon 17yrs
Daughter Marissa 16yrs
Dog Bailey

12 Forest River Georgetown 350TS Hellwig sway bars, BlueOx TrueCenter stabilizer

13 Ford Explorer Roadmaster Stowmaster 5000, VIP Tow>
A bad day camping is
better than a good day at work!

Grit_dog
Navigator
Navigator
Sweet!
Great option. Especially for work trucks. The gassers are always a little anemic for towing and big Const companies like ours donโ€™t buy many diesels for crew trucks.

Agreed great time to be alive if youโ€™re a gearhead!
2016 Ram 2500, MotorOps.ca EFIlive tuned, 5โ€ turbo back, 6" lift on 37s
2017 Heartland Torque T29 - Sold.
Couple of Arctic Fox TCs - Sold

parker_rowe
Explorer
Explorer
rhagfo wrote:
I wonder what the fuel mileage will be towing say 12,000# and empty?


Probably similar to the current gassers, but with a lot less downshifting.
2015 Starcraft TravelStar 239TBS 6500 GVWR
1997 GMC Suburban K2500 7.4 Vortec/4.10
1977 Kawasaki KZ1000