A little background on the term "Ply Rating".
Way back when, tires were mostly made of cotton thread (and were bias tires) - and pretty standardized thread size and breaking strength. In those days, a tire's strength could be gauged by the number of plies it had.
When synethic fibers came along - notably nylon - the tire could be built with fewer plies and retain the same strength - hence the term "Ply Rating" (PR). Nylon came in a number of strengths and one could build a tire with different number of plies at the same strength. In other words, not only were there fewer plies than with cotton, but a different number of nylon plies depending on how the tire was engineered.
It didn't take very long for people to be confused between ply and PR, so the tire manufacturers created the term "Load Range" and used letters. This occurred in the 1960's. However, many people had a hard time moving on and kept using PR - and kept being confused when the number of plies didn't match the PR number.
So when radial tires were introduced and steel wire became the common belt material, the connection between the number of plies and the PR became even more remote. As an example, over the road truck tires (18 wheeler variety) the common construction is 1 steel body ply and 2 steel belts with perhaps a protector (non-working) belt or 2 (frequently steel as well!)
In the ST and LT tire lineup, the common construction is 2 polyester body plies with 2 steel belts with perhaps a nylon cap ply (or 2).
When tire engineers talk about tire strength, they are referring to the body plies in radial tires. The belts stiffen the tread area, and don't affect the strength of the sidewall. So while an LT tire may have 6 tread plies (2+2+2), it's the sidewall that determines its Load Range - and because of the variety of fibers available, a LR C can have the same number of plies as a LR F.
********************************************************************
CapriRacer
Visit my web site:
www.BarrysTireTech.com