Forum Discussion
- Community Alumni
Tommy457 wrote:
BTW PackerBacker, GO PACK GO!!!
:C - Mike_UpExplorer
samhain7 wrote:
I have the trailer listed in my signature...and my frame has a huge JAYCO barcoded sticker on it. Nothing on the frame says Starcraft.
My frame is welded like the one in your picture...
My trailer is the exact same as the whitehawke, so look and see what frame they have on that trailer.
White Hawk Trailers have the integrated A-Frame. - samhain7ExplorerI have the trailer listed in my signature...and my frame has a huge JAYCO barcoded sticker on it. Nothing on the frame says Starcraft.
My frame is welded like the one in your picture...
My trailer is the exact same as the whitehawke, so look and see what frame they have on that trailer. - Tommy457ExplorerBTW PackerBacker, GO PACK GO!!!
- Tommy457ExplorerWe definitely love the floor plan. I was thinking the same thing about the height of the trailer. We plan on doing a little boon docking after we get better familiar with the RV, but all in due time.
As far as the weight of the TT, I don't have the Max Payload, but do have the Max Tow Package. The max payload would have given me and additional 400 hundred lbs of payload capacity. The UVW is 5340 lbs with a dry tongue weight of 590 lbs. That calculates for my TV to be at 10.9% of the tongue weight. When fully loaded, the GVWR is 7700 and puts the tongue weight around 871 lbs (assuming 10.9%. If I assume 14% of trailer tongue weight at 7700 lbs, that would be 1100 lb of tongue weight. My max tongue weight allowance is 1150. Its funny that they can say "you can pull 11,300 lbs" but they never say that the weight you can tow is really driven by your hitch tongue weight rating, tongue weight of trailer and your payload capacity of the TV. I definitely did lots of research before buying my F150 Ecoboost. - BubbaChrisExplorerMy Heartland North Trail is built that way and I have full confidence in that area being very sturdy.
The other hurdle need to keep an eye on is Max Payload for your F150. Unless you got the max cargo version, you may need to stay with TT's max weights of 6,000-7,000 lbs. - gmw_photosExplorer
tatest wrote:
That's weird, compared to an equivalent Jayco. One company, two brands.
Depending on the model, it either gets built for Starcraft at one of several Jayco plants, or it gets built for Jayco at the Starcraft plant, with differences in trim, equipment, and of course branding.
Autumn Ridge line is bigger than what Starcraft builds, so it is a Jayco product. Do the Jayco employees intentionally do shoddy work on the frames of trailers that will be Starcraft branded? How would they know, at the frame plant, which is a separate operation, which brand is it going to eventually be.
But could this brand rivalry be the explanation for the rough finish on a Jayco popup I looked at in early 2014 at the factory showroom, considering that the Starcraft plant was building that model for Jayco?
As a conspiracy theory, could it make national news?
A lot of companies have someone else build their frames, such as the often maligned Lippert. My camper has a Lippert frame. Honestly, some of the welds at the front end are not too pretty, but they are holding up fine. The welds at the rear of the frame are much better looking. Suggests to me that a couple different guys were welding on this thing, and one guy was more experienced than the other.
It will either hold or it won't. If it doesn't, I will weld it myself to make it better. If a person cannot weld, there are shops on just about every corner ( slight exaggeration ! ) that can weld and fix these kinds of issues.
To the OP, my suggestion is buy the floorplan you like, and then make the trailer work for you. These things are not rocket science. Fix whatever might go wrong, and go enjoy camping. - gmw_photosExplorerMany consumers want a flat floor inside the RV, with the slideout room floor being flat, same level as the main floor. In other words, no "fenderwell" for the tires to come "up" inside the coach.
That means the floor of the trailer has to be at least 27" to 29" off the ground. Makes the main frame of the trailer rather high. In order to get a reasonable coupler height for the ball, they manufacture these under frame components ( A-frame sections ) and possibly too, an underslung coupler.
As long as it's all welded together correctly, it works just fine.
That's my view of it anyway. My Funfinder is made this way, and one of the advantages of all this is very good ground clearance for uneven ground or roads that could have clearance issues. It's one of the reasons I chose this camper, because occasionally I go off the beaten path. - Mike_UpExplorer
93Cobra2771 wrote:
On a side note, you will notice that most of the ones with the "through frame" tongue tend to have a bottom mount coupler.
My unit has under frame tongue as well. Nothing to worry about.
My 29' trailer with the integrated hitch has the coupler on top.
The bottom mount couplers are usually on the heavier models with slides. - 93Cobra2771ExplorerOn a side note, you will notice that most of the ones with the "through frame" tongue tend to have a bottom mount coupler.
My unit has under frame tongue as well. Nothing to worry about.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,027 PostsLatest Activity: Apr 19, 2019