Forum Discussion
RoyJ
Oct 29, 2020Explorer
I'll add something, based on the map above, if we set 400 lb-ft, or roughly 40% torque put, as the "lightly loaded" driving situation. i.e. cruising in city traffic. Then it's definitely better (strictly in the mpg sense) to "lug" the engine between 1000 - 1400 rpm.
If we let the engine creep up to even 2000 rpm, fuel efficiency can drop well into the yellow / red zone.
But OEM probably factors in many other parameters, DPF life can be one of them, or "passing power" / "driver satisfaction". Hence they'll program shift points higher than 1400 rpm.
Funny how times change, we now call 400 lb-ft light load, whereas for the first ISB that was foot to the floor...
If we let the engine creep up to even 2000 rpm, fuel efficiency can drop well into the yellow / red zone.
But OEM probably factors in many other parameters, DPF life can be one of them, or "passing power" / "driver satisfaction". Hence they'll program shift points higher than 1400 rpm.
Funny how times change, we now call 400 lb-ft light load, whereas for the first ISB that was foot to the floor...
About Travel Trailer Group
44,029 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 21, 2025