Forum Discussion
ricatic
Mar 02, 2012Explorer
Huntindog wrote:
Rick is quoting me correctly. But what I have since noticed in comparing Ford and GMs responses, is that GM broke out their figures a little better. They have a table that lists the numbers of SUSPECTED cases of misfuels/contaminated fuel issues. What I noticed was that if I subtracted this number from GMs total was that the result was almost the same as Fords warrantied numbers.. So I am surmising that since GM hasn't been shown to deny warranty, that their rotal numbers look worse than Fords until they are corrected for what Ford would have refused to warranty.
It makes sense to me anyways.
Now I have not read any of the appendices attached to either Ford or GM's responses, so my opinion may change as this info comes out. (Fords is over 800 pages! Don't know about GM.) Reading this will take awhile. Others are doing it. I'd give it a shot but my computers programing won't allow it.
Well said...and it makes sense to me. The difference between the two manufacturers regarding HPFP failure numbers is statistically insignificant...the difference in the treatment of their respective customers...staggering...
Thanks for the reply
Regards
About Around The Campfire
44 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 27, 2026