briansue wrote:
Below are a couple of things from the "Forum Rules" and also from a "Sticky" about what might be deleted.
I have a suggestion. Many readers of this website - meaning all the forums on it - have signed on to see any new post. What that means is some people who have no interest whatsoever in Mexico will see a post they think may be of interest to them and click to read. They then find them selves on a forum about Mexico and their opinions about Mexico have no basis in fact yet they post those opinions. To keep the flamers and trolls off this forum about Mexico it might be a good idea to be careful about how you word your "Topic" so readers are clear what it is about. In many cases we see topics that are specific to nothing and that make no sense to many readers - so they click. Then we get some trolls and flamers. The Topic line should in some way indicate this is about Mexico so those with no interest might not be tempted to click. That might help. Topic lines that are clearly not specific or can lead anyone to click (such as Donald Trump) are going to get a lot of heat which we do not need.
These forums are for members to members only and are family oriented. Commercial enterprises and/or their representatives are not allowed to post in these forums. If you want to participate with others on the Open Roads Forum, you will need to register. Registration is "free" and only takes about 2 minutes. A significant reason for the success of the Open Roads Forum is our insistence that all participants obey the simple set of rules posted below. If you can abide by the rules below please continue and click Register. If you feel these rules are unacceptable, thank you for your honesty, and we ask that you please stop here.
To insure a prompt and quality response to your question or comment, you must post it to the proper forum. Consider the following guidelines before posting:
We reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason
You are not allowed to post the same message in multiple forums without permission from one of the Open Roads Forum moderators.
The use of profanity is not allowed. An "integrated watchdog" will monitor your post and attempt to expunge objectionable language.
"Flaming" of other participants is strictly forbidden.
Professional conduct is a primary requirement for participation on the Open Roads Forum.
Attacks on moderators will not be tolerated and may result in an immediate ban. Moderators have to make difficult judgment calls, but remember, they are human. If you have a concern about a particular moderator or treatment of a post by a moderator, email websitesupport@goodsam.com.
Spamming, in any form, is strictly forbidden.
You may not use the Open Roads Forum to either advertise or promote commercial endeavors. This includes direct posts, member name, URLS in your profile or signature, as well as, active links to other sites on the Internet.
You may include URLs or active links to commercial sites for the purpose of expanding on comments or providing additional information as part of regular forum interactions.
You may not use the Open Roads Forum for "For Sale" or "Wanted" posts. Solicitations by private/public agencies, or individuals for any cause are also not allowed.
Posts are not allowed in which a local, state, or federal consumer action board and/or legal counsel is/have been involved. This includes posts related to future, ongoing or past lawsuits.
Political and religious posts, pictures, links, signatures etc. are not allowed in these forums and may be removed without notice or discussion.
You may post about problems you have with a product or organization, however the use of the forums to repeatedly attack them is strictly forbidden.
The above rules will be strictly enforced. Continued violations may result in loss of Open Roads Forum privileges and complaints being lodged with your Internet Service Provider. Open Roads Forum reserves the right to refuse and/or revoke membership to anyone without notice. If a member name is banned, it may not be reinstated.
Other than enforcing the above rules, the management and staff does not attempt to validate any comments or recommendations provided by participants. As such, The Open Roads Forum is not responsible for any inaccuracies that may result in personal injury or damage.
****************************************************
The purpose and intention of the RVing in Mexico forum is to share RVing experiences in Mexico by those that have in the past or who are currently Rving in Mexico and those that are planning to do so.
Posts that are not DIRECTLY related to RVing may be deleted without comment.
Specifically posts/threads about the drug wars, drug shootings, news reports of such etc. will be deleted also without comment unless the incident involves an RVer.
These actions are being taken to restore the content of the forum to its intended purpose.
I agree that forums need rules however there are so many holes, ill or not defined terms and just plain false claims in the rules as to make any two bit lawyer shudder. They could be re-written to make them clearer for sure.
Just a few examples that I think are interesting: Define "Flaming"
I guarantee you out of 10 moderators I would guess there will be 5 different ideas of the definitions and how they handle it.
"Strictly Enforced" This is clearly not the case as each forum seems to have it;'s own level tolerance for spirited discussion.
Just what qualifies as "Attacking" a moderator? Disagreement? Posting about Moderation Policies? I for one am definitely unsure about this one.
There are many others in that list of rules which I have read in detail. I feel that I and most others abide by the rules. And I think that rules for a site like this are important.
But I think there should also be some due process involved for members as part of the rules. I can see a situation where someone may not think a statement was "Flaming" or that they fouled the rules, but their post was read with a "different Tone" in someone elses head.
IE. I think any member that posts something that MAY violate the rules should have the option of retracting the post before a thread or post is taken down.
Second: It makes sense to me that if someone is going to be removed from the site or have a post deleted they deserve an explanation of what rule (s) they have transgressed. And have a chance to retract or a second chance.
I think the above is just civility and fairness. And while I am sure the Moderators who do a credible job are busy they have signed up for this duty and It seems it would be just part of the job.
So While the rules are good I feel they need a re-write for clarity, specificity and consistency.
