pull-forward sites?
Hope this is an OK forum for this topic-- it seemed like the most appropriate place. We are in the planning phase of an RV park. There is a small lake, and the designer suggested having the sites ...
Forum Discussion
I guess my issue with this is that from what folks are posting, parks that offer pull in sites seem to make them the sites with the great view - leaving the back-in sites nothing. This seems to be an insult for all the other RVers. Why should only the MHs get the view? I have a MH, but honestly, I would shy away from a place like that because it sounds elitist - and if they're giving preferential sites to MHs, then what else are they acting preferential or prejudiced about?
If you're going to do it, I'd suggest breaking the "prime view sites" in half - half pull in, half back-in. Put all the pull ins on one side, the back-ins on the other side, and a hedge or bathrooms or community room or access to the lake. in the middle. That will eliminate the patio-to-patio issue; will let both MHs and others have a view; and you don't have to have double pedestals.
If you're going to do it, I'd suggest breaking the "prime view sites" in half - half pull in, half back-in. Put all the pull ins on one side, the back-ins on the other side, and a hedge or bathrooms or community room or access to the lake. in the middle. That will eliminate the patio-to-patio issue; will let both MHs and others have a view; and you don't have to have double pedestals.
