Forum Discussion
- webslaveExplorerThe batwing worked fine (I tried it first), but, it actually made the antenna even more "directional" in its reception. The Jack had the same reception qualities (signal strength) as the Sensar with the Bat Wing, but, had much better "off-axis" signal acceptance. That off-axis betterment meant more stations when they weren't all coming from the same point on the compass. If they all came from the same point, there wasn't any change, better or worse. Most of the places we camp, the stations will come from several different towns and I found with the Jack, I could get more of those stations without having to re-aim the antenna. The Jack won't give you any "extra boost", but, it will appear as if it does because of its better off-axis reception.
- esox07Explorer
webslave wrote:
Yes it is a direct replacement for the Sensar head. Here's a couple of pictures from the one I had on my bumper pull (don't have any photos of the one on the 5er):
In response to another poster that noted that the Jack, when installed, leaves the posts "naked" to rest on the roof, I didn't like that either. I got a a rubber "foot" from the hardware store and put it on the post so that it cushioned the post against the roof.
The best price I've seen on the Jack is here:
Current "best price" that I've found
I've bought a lot of stuff from them. Good prices, fast shipping, but, I wouldn't know about problem resolving since I've never had a problem with them...
Yep, definitely some good prices on that site. But I went ahead and ordered a BatWing instead. My original Sensar antenna is only two years old and already amplified. I am hoping the batwing gives me the extra boost. If not, maybe I will give the Jack a shot.
Thanks,
Bruce - webslaveExplorerYes it is a direct replacement for the Sensar head. Here's a couple of pictures from the one I had on my bumper pull (don't have any photos of the one on the 5er):
In response to another poster that noted that the Jack, when installed, leaves the posts "naked" to rest on the roof, I didn't like that either. I got a a rubber "foot" from the hardware store and put it on the post so that it cushioned the post against the roof.
The best price I've seen on the Jack is here:
Current "best price" that I've found
I've bought a lot of stuff from them. Good prices, fast shipping, but, I wouldn't know about problem resolving since I've never had a problem with them... - esox07ExplorerOK, really interested in buying one of these. Is this all I need: http://www.amazon.com/JACK-OA-8000-Digital-TV-Antenna/dp/B003FO2O1G/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1367378703&sr=1-2&keywords=wingman+booster
And it seems it comes with a signal booster/amp. Should I use that one or the existing one on the TT? Also, here is a couple photos of my current "Winegard" antenna. Will this Jack antenna simply replace the old one on top of the mast?
Also, is there a better price online other than $50.67 that Amazon is charging?
Thanks,
Bruce - RollandBExplorerI've got a Jack on topmost my fiver and am happy with its operation. More thing I would add is its height. Overall I'm about 13 feet, the Jack I above the roof about the same as the AC. It just looks like it sticks up there and a concern for tree limbs.
- esox07ExplorerThanks for remembering to follow up on the review. I am thinking about doing an upgrade. My antenna doesn't pick up crap. But I have a lower end trailer and probably a "lower end" antenna as well so I hope the upgrade will be a big help.
Bruce - REWahooExplorerAs promised, I'm following up on my Jack antenna install and how it performs vs. the old batwing (without wingman) it replaced. I'm currently in the campground at Hot Springs National Park, located in 'Gulpha Gulch' where I've always had trouble getting a reliable OTA signal from some local stations.
The Jack does provide a better signal - not perfect (there is an occasional pixellation event) but it is definitely an improvement vs. the batwing it replaced. Since my batwing did not have a wingman add-on (no room for it due to the location of an AC unit) there is no way to judge how my Jack compares to that configuration.
In addition to the slightly better performance, the lighter weight Jack is much easier to crank up and down and to rotate.
I'm a happy camper... - CC-skipjackExplorerReplaced my entire 'wing' with the 'Jack' unit and am totally satisfied. Just having the signal indicator makes it almost worth while in itself. That plus I love not having to remember to loweer the antennae before moving!
- REWahooExplorer
IAMICHABOD wrote:
REWahoo wrote:
Yes, that's it. Comes with everything you need to replace the old bat-wing head on top of your crank-up mast. Simple to do, I did mine yesterday.
That sounds great,let us know how it all works out for you.
I know mine works better than the others. :C
The trailer is currently parked on top of a hill, 40 miles from the "antenna farm". I was getting OK signals from the bat wing and I can't really see much difference with the new Jack.
The real test probably won't come until April when we'll be at a couple of RV parks where reception with the bat wing was spotty. - IAMICHABODExplorer II
REWahoo wrote:
Yes, that's it. Comes with everything you need to replace the old bat-wing head on top of your crank-up mast. Simple to do, I did mine yesterday.
That sounds great,let us know how it all works out for you.
I know mine works better than the others. :C
About DIY Maintenance
RV projects you can tackle on your own with a few friendly pointers.4,352 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 29, 2025