tpi wrote:
Harvard, on mine, without change of the eccentrics, would that mean I could essentially dedicate the .6 camber towards increasing the positive caster? The camber can be in spec and be as little as -0.3
Any more comment on the toe in? I don't want to go too far with it. If the .5 degree is excessive, would something like .3 or .4 be better. I'm convinced the 0 degree is not the best setting for on center feel.
What do you have for eccentrics? I can only speak of Ingall 594 where you rob Peter to pay Paul, the more +CASTER the less CAMBER adjustment available.
Regarding TOE, I have alignment specs for 2004, 2005, 2010 and 2011. All 4 documents specify TOE as:
0.06 DEGREES +/- 0.25 DEGREES, or
0.03 INCHES +/- 0.13 INCHES.
Personally I would shoot for about 1/16 (0.0625) to 1/8 (0.125) INCHES or about 0.1 to 0.2 DEGREES.