pauldub wrote:
Given the amount of camber correction that was needed, that was probably as much caster as he could get. I think they've done the best that can be done with the alignment.
This is true but let us remember that the abnormal amount of starting CAMBER was with bushings other then the Ingalls 594s. The big question in my mind is what is the (theoretical) CAMBER with the Ingalls 594s set to NEUTRAL. We will be able to reverse engineer the neutral CAMBER once we have the current setting of the Ingalls 594s.
It would be very unusual to have so much +CAMBER with the 594s at neutral unless the unit is very lightly loaded on the front axel, I believe this unit in question (lawtonglen) to be a 21 foot model. The uncertainity lies with having so little data to go by but having the current 594s settings should shed some light on the subject.