Forum Discussion
mumkin
Aug 16, 2012Explorer
IAMICHABOD wrote:
But of course the one that mumkin has will get better mileage than the "normal class C" It has no large overhead,it is more areodynamic more on the line of a class B and only has a GVWR of 12300 lbs about a ton less than most class C s. according to their website.
I can see why it gets better mileage,but to compare it to the normal class C is like compareing an apple to a pear. :B
Kinda the same but NOT.
But it is on a Chevy Chassis so it is keeping with the theme of the thread.
I would disagree with your interpretation. It is the same Chevy cut-away, only with a much better design. After all, I started with a GWV Class B on the Ford E350 with an overhead bed so I chose to buy something more aerodynamic and to get better handling. As far as weight, that is going to go along with length. Naturally if you have 30+ feet, you are going to weigh more. Other than that... a Chevy cutaway is a Chevy cutaway. Many of the RVs being compared here are 22ft.
I suspect that the difference has as much to do with a heavy foot as the overhead cab.
And Jim... I don't have the 6 speed... I got the last of the older platforms. :C
About Motorhome Group
38,763 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 21, 2016