Chevrolet Based Class C *UPDATED AGAIN*
I do not want to start a war or a bunch of flaming, but I have to ask. What are the problems with a Chevrolet Based Class C? Other than they are hard to find. They are easier to find now I have rea...
Forum Discussion
IAMICHABOD wrote:
On the class C- such as mumkin and gene in ne both have and double didget mileage these are both aerodynamic where a typical Class C is not,and they both have a GVWR of 12300 lbs about a ton lighter than most Class C even the short ones. Most of which have a simular 14000lb or more GVWR
Mine is 26 ft and has A GVWR of 14050 not quite a ton heavier but it
has the aerodynamics of a brick. It Is at least a foot taller,I would guess because I cant stand up in one.
Heavy foot or not pushing a Ton more down the road in a vehicle that is aerodynamic as a brick you can not compare them as equal.
As I said before like compareing an apple with a pear they can be put in the same bag but they are not the same.
Just what is a "typical C." I see C's from 21 to 35 feet. I expect that the weight variation depends on whether it is fiberglass like mine... or a wood frame like a Born Free... or whatever else a converter comes up with or how one chooses to have them equipped.
But they are ALL apples. This is why mileage threads are pretty much a waste of time. If one asks a general question on it, you will get the range of mileage rates possible within the range of different types of C vehicles. You just can't declare that a more aerodynamic C isn't a C because it isn't as brick-like as yours. :C
