gkainz wrote:
pnichols wrote:
Sometimes there can be a valid case for "throwing more parts at it":
I recently told my outstanding RV repair shop to replace several parts in our rig's refusing-to-light 13 year old furnace, in order to both - fix the current problem, plus while they were in there go ahead and replace several common furnace components likely to be near needing replacement so that - we don't get surprised by a failing furnace while out and about on an RV trip. It's called "Preventive Maintenance".
My repair shop refused to do that - they insisted on fixing only the exact problem by trouble-shooting to find and replace only the exact part needed. (See above in this thread for what the freak cause of my furnace problem was.)
I now have a functioning furnace while paying for only one failed furnace part. However, I now also have an RV furnace still with a bunch of 13 year old parts inside it that could surpise us anytime by having to tolerate one or more freezing drycamp nights before either - running the Onan all night to power an electric heater, having to move to a $$ full hookup and boring commercial campground, or having to truncate the trip and hurry home.
I guess I'm slow to learn that ... repair shops love to replace one failed part at a time so as to make shop labor charges over and over by replacing only one failed (hopefully different part) at a time over time.
I guess the difference is asking for a furnace repair vs a furnace rebuild? Do they offer such a thing?
A good point and a good question! I didn't think to ask specifically, but they probably could have suggested it and I probably would have agreed.
We HATE failures in the field when RV'ing because we could be out in a field when something fails.