Seattle Steve wrote:
Lantley wrote:
Ivylog wrote:
Get a Million $ insurance policy guaranteeing coverage for any and all damages they might cause...I would then let them into my RV Park as that would make up for voiding my insurance.
No need for a policy you keep your vacancy and I will keep my money.
I know I can find another park without breed restrictions to accept my money, I hope/trust you can find another camper to fill your vacancy.
It's a win for both of us no policy required.
I've spent thousands in camping fees over the years, unfortunately none of it went to your CG. Unfortunately your breed restricting policies are restricting your revenues along with the dogs.
You are only seeing one side of the issue. As a non-pet person, I always check out the pet rules at potential parks and choose the ones with the strictest rules. So, in my case, they are gaining business because of their rules. I'm pretty sure there are far more people RVing without pets than there are people RVing with dogs on the aggressive breeds list, so the parks with stricter rules are going to be the winners.
The bottom line is that a private park can have whatever policy it wants regarding dogs. It's up to them to decide if it is worth it or not.
But if the park's insurance company puts a ban on breeds, then just say that. No one is asking you to ignore your insurance company. So no need to suggest a dumb thing like "get a million dollar insurance policy so I can ignore my insurance company's policy".