Sensar 2 to 4 with wingman to sensar pro
Our 2002 antenna died a salt laden death, had a old sensar 2, not bad but nothing in some spots. Said to self, just get the 4 w/the wingman, big improvement until a 5er blocked the signal. We were ...
Forum Discussion
As a ham radio operator I have been known to build my own antennas for other bands. Thus I've studied a bit of antenna theory (A fairly large bit) and such. Based upon that I truly like the Sensar IV or the II or III With Wingman (Not a lot of difference once the wingman is added) The Sensar pro I was not so ... Convinced.. Of based on research alone.. but I have one.
And speaking of research.. Another member of I believe these forums (Might be one of the other groups I no longer play in) has access to a lab. so he put 'em to the test .. HE put a Sensar III (No wingman as I recall) up against the heavily advertised Jack.. The Winegard was hands down the winner. He tried on several channels and the WORST the WInegard did was deliver 2x the signal the Jack delivered. THE WORST. on some channels it was many times that.
And the Sensar Pro.. Not only does it provide still stronger signals but makes pointing a breeze as well. I've been using one for about 5 or 6 years.
And speaking of research.. Another member of I believe these forums (Might be one of the other groups I no longer play in) has access to a lab. so he put 'em to the test .. HE put a Sensar III (No wingman as I recall) up against the heavily advertised Jack.. The Winegard was hands down the winner. He tried on several channels and the WORST the WInegard did was deliver 2x the signal the Jack delivered. THE WORST. on some channels it was many times that.
And the Sensar Pro.. Not only does it provide still stronger signals but makes pointing a breeze as well. I've been using one for about 5 or 6 years.
