Sensar 2 to 4 with wingman to sensar pro
Our 2002 antenna died a salt laden death, had a old sensar 2, not bad but nothing in some spots. Said to self, just get the 4 w/the wingman, big improvement until a 5er blocked the signal. We were ...
Forum Discussion
SCVJeff is the one that did the tests. Here is a link to his post:
http://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/27171026.cfm
He tested the Winegard batwing with the Wingman attachment and the King Jack. The test was not done in a lab, but a lab grade spectrum analyzer was used.
I have both a Sensar IV and a Jack. The Sensar IV excels for the VHF band but I find that the Jack is on par for the UHF. Most TV stations broadcast on UHF so the Jack works well in areas where all the stations broadcast UHF. If I'm in an area where a station I want to watch is a VHF station I sometimes have to deploy the Sensar IV which I have mounted on a mast.
http://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/27171026.cfm
He tested the Winegard batwing with the Wingman attachment and the King Jack. The test was not done in a lab, but a lab grade spectrum analyzer was used.
I have both a Sensar IV and a Jack. The Sensar IV excels for the VHF band but I find that the Jack is on par for the UHF. Most TV stations broadcast on UHF so the Jack works well in areas where all the stations broadcast UHF. If I'm in an area where a station I want to watch is a VHF station I sometimes have to deploy the Sensar IV which I have mounted on a mast.
