Tv antennas blowing off

ncrowley wrote:
I would change the antenna. I have a dome Rayzar Automatic antenna and I really like it.

SoundGuy wrote:
Would like to ask - by any chance is your Winegard Rayzar Automatic a replacement for a Winegard Sensar IV and if so do you find it as sensitive as the IV as Winegard claims?

ncrowley wrote:
I cannot compare the two antennas since I have not used the two types of antennas in the same place and compared the signals. All I can tell you is that so far, it has found plenty of stations in the places we have used it and the picture quality is very good.

"Picture quality" has nothing to do with the type of antenna receiving the signal. Rather, I'd like to establish whether the Rayzar Automatic is comparable to the Sensar IV in terms of signal sensitivity. Certainly the Rayzar would be more convenient but if it's sensitivity isn't on par with what is arguably the best out there in RV OTA antennas, the Sensar IV, then I'd not make the switch, especially considering how pricey the Rayzar is. Thanks for reply though. :)

SoundGuy wrote:

ncrowley wrote:
I would change the antenna. I have a dome Rayzar Automatic antenna and I really like it. I do not have the crank it up and down or position it once it is up.

Would like to ask - by any chance is your Winegard Rayzar Automatic a replacement for a Winegard Sensar IV and if so do you find it as sensitive as the IV as Winegard claims? Despite the Rayzar's substantial cost I'm interested, if for no other reason than it's annoying having to continually rotate my IV's head to receive stations transmitting from different directions.

I cannot compare the two antennas since I have not used the two types of antennas in the same place and compared the signals. All I can tell you is that so far, it has found plenty of stations in the places we have used it and the picture quality is very good. Before the Rayzar, we had one where you pushed a button to have it go up and then you pushed another set of buttons to have it turn to get the best signal. The old one would not go down half the time and I had to get on the roof and push it down. We replaced it with the Rayzar and the installation was easy. We are very pleased with the Rayzar.

spoon059 wrote:
I wish you could opt out of a TV antenna. I don't generally watch TV when camping anyways and would prefer to not have yet another protrusion into my roof.

You can, but most folks do not know that. At least if you are buying NEW you can.

That said though I would not recommend it... Here is why

With the new "Digital" TV broadcasts (New since 2007) in most markets at least one "Tier 2" "Channel" (like 4-3) is weather Forcasts And Radar enabling you to live track storms in the area.. IF no other channel that one is good.. Often plays decent music in the background so long as the talking head is not yammering. (Weather guy from Station).

I wish you could opt out of a TV antenna. I don't generally watch TV when camping anyways and would prefer to not have yet another protrusion into my roof.

ncrowley wrote:
I would change the antenna. I have a dome Rayzar Automatic antenna and I really like it. I do not have the crank it up and down or position it once it is up.

Would like to ask - by any chance is your Winegard Rayzar Automatic a replacement for a Winegard Sensar IV and if so do you find it as sensitive as the IV as Winegard claims? Despite the Rayzar's substantial cost I'm interested, if for no other reason than it's annoying having to continually rotate my IV's head to receive stations transmitting from different directions.

I would change the antenna. I have a dome Rayzar Automatic antenna and I really like it. I do not have the crank it up and down or position it once it is up.

I have only seen one of those "Flying Saucers" come off and .. Well it took a lot more than going down the highway (The story at end of this post)

I would not replace that type of antenna with a like type. I'd go with a Winegard Sensar IV.. There is a reason for this. Several in fact.

First the Sensar line when cranked down is very "Flat" not much chance of anythign snagging it and ripping it off (See story) 2nd it is the BEST rv TV antenna, that flying saucer.. Well likely the WORST RV Tv antenna. Bar none in both cases.

The story
Brand new class C with one of those parked beside me. First time in the RV, I had to show the owner which keys fit which locks on the door (Same locks I have). Sticker still in the window they had flown in and the dealer picked 'em up at the airport and handed them the keys to their new "house".

They went to dinner down the road. the sign on the parking structure said the ceiling was high enough for the RIG but the Pipe.. Hangs LOWER than the number painted on it.. Went right in UNDER that saucer. Ripped it clean off, flew up and landed on the vent cover for the bathroom vent. SMASH.

And the sticker was still in the window.

While I am not fond of my omni antenna, it is fastened quite well. It has a couple screws going into the stem of the mushroom to hold it. Even if the screws came out, you would need to turn/unlock the head from the base, before it will lift off. It works quite well for tv reception when fairly close to towers. It doubles as an FM radio antenna, which works great.

I use a Jack antenna on a mast, fastened to my ladder, when I need better distant reception.

Jerry

I do not think I will be buying one of that type..Sounds like they do not travel well..

Wow sounds like a very poor design. Keystone should be ashamed of themselves for not covering this issue. Now that it has happened twice they should pay for the first unit as well