Boycott “No Campfires”
We RVers need to Boycott places that don’t allow a special part of the camping experience...”campfires”. It’s bad enough that so many places don’t allow wood fires but not allowing propane campfires i...
Forum Discussion
Airdaile wrote:Uh yeah, I totally missed the posts that want to ban campfires, or did you decide not to post them? Or do you just want to go ahead and admit you're wrong about that?fj12ryder wrote:
You might want to check your meds, I don't think they're working for you. No one, I repeat, NO ONE, had advocated banning fires because they're smoky and stinky.
Oh Really?TechWritet wrote:
Au contraire. Please supply a list of these smoke free campgrounds. They're my next stops.YOU wrote:
I'm another one that wants that list so I can save them as my favorite RV'ing spots. Campfires only do one thing well: stink and smoke, okay two things. More power to 'em.midnitesadie wrote:
not a bad Idea no m camp fires,they just stink up the camp any way. and if it would save ONE FORREST FIRE it would be worth it. p.s. your fire stinks up my rv. no thanks.colliehauler wrote:
While I don't hate campfires I do agree with inept campers that not only burn wood but garbage and plastic. I to would not want a campfire in close quarter's next to my camper.YOU wrote:
Given the choice between smoky, stinky fires or bugs, I'll take the bugs every time. And the only way it keeps the bugs away is if you sit in the smoke. Boy is that pleasant.ncrowley wrote:
I also prefer a campground that does not allow campfires at the site. I am fine with a place away from the sites, but I dislike the smell, smoke, and embers that fly up.Deb and Ed M wrote:
I've asked to be moved from a site where my neighbors already had a smoky fire going, no whining involved - it was easier for us to move than for the neighbors to change which way the wind was blowing.
