Campground = low income housing???

parkmanaa wrote:
Allowing long-term residents doesn't have to mean "TAPED-UP WINDOWS, DIRTY RVS, VISITORS CARS PARKED EVERYWHERE", and all the other insinuations that anyone staying more than a night are BUMS.
The long-term guests RVs can look as good as the overnighters; it just depends on the park establishing and then enforcing their rules. Before you get too critical, attempt to look at the reason for the 'long-term' RVer:
a. Came in from out-of-town for a 6-month, one year, or whatever temp. job.
b. A visiting, contract nurse who signs for 13 weeks, then may have contract
extended.
c. A person who is selling their home and building a new one.
d. A person whose home was damaged in a fire or windstorm.
e. A person has a large park model with 5 slides by the lake, and thoroughly
enjoys the RV Park life.
f. From out of area, got a job, and living in RV while house-hunt.
Believe me, the list of reasons go on and on and in most cases the persons are not living in the RV because they can't afford anything else.

Finally, if the RV park didn't have the steady income from those long-term guests, you would probably be paying a lot more for your nightly visit.

I will add to your list. I just don't want the roots that a permanent dwelling entails. I am quite content to have my RV on my seasonal site here in WV from April to October and then venture south from November to April. And I can agree that not all long term residents look like they starred in "The Grapes of Wrath". The seasonal sites here in WV are well maintained and the lawns are mowed regularly. People that store things out side have either the plastic or metal storage buildings that are also in good condition.