In the past couple of years full timing we have visited maybe 50 campgrounds in over 26 states. There are always a list of rules, most of which are generally the same. It seems we have started to see numerous CG's that do not allow pets. I don't know if this has always been the case or not.The most unusual rule I think we found was at a CG in California. We carry two bicycles mounted on the front of our tow vehicle. When the check-in lady saw them she immediately pointed out to us that we were required to wear helmets at all times while using our bicycles in the campground. Upon further inquiries we discovered that this was not any type of goofy local or state requirement, just a CG rule.

C-Bears wrote:In the past couple of years full timing we have visited maybe 50 campgrounds in over 26 states. There are always a list of rules, most of which are generally the same. It seems we have started to see numerous CG's that do not allow pets. I don't know if this has always been the case or not.The most unusual rule I think we found was at a CG in California. We carry two bicycles mounted on the front of our tow vehicle. When the check-in lady saw them she immediately pointed out to us that we were required to wear helmets at all times while using our bicycles in the campground. Upon further inquiries we discovered that this was not any type of goofy local or state requirement, just a CG rule.can you pls post the name and location of that campground so we can add it to our 'avoid' list?

It's private property, and they can impose any rules they wish. If they get too ridiculous, they they'll start losing customer's business. I wonder if the bicycle helmet rule is based upon some liability issue they've dealt with in the past? I wouldn't put it past some people to get injured riding their bikes, then sue the campground for their own lack of responsibility.

TucsonJim wrote:It's private property, and they can impose any rules they wish. If they get too ridiculous, they they'll start losing customer's business. I wonder if the bicycle helmet rule is based upon some liability issue they've dealt with in the past? I wouldn't put it past some people to get injured riding their bikes, then sue the campground for their own lack of responsibility.I was thinking the same thing.

When I was 14 y/o (1975) I had a young friend die from a bike accident. A helmet would have kept him from any serious injusry. If I had a CG I would employ a helmet rule and in this state it's the law.You never know where these rules come from. It's such a minor thing to ask of their guests and it could be it came about for a pretty good reason.

ScottG wrote:...It's such a minor thing to ask of their guests and it could be it came about for a pretty good reason.and that's the inherent problem with all of these well-meaning, nanny rules. individually they're all minor things but collectively we're being buried by these minor things. my wife and I are perfectly able to care for ourselves. want to encourage helmets, fine. but the decision is, or should be, ours.

CG Rules - New Trends? | Good Sam Community

Homer1
Explorer
Feb 03, 2015
In the many many years of riding bikes, I have yet to ever see a bad head injury or really any kind of head injury. I have seen lots of skinned elbows, skinned knees, skinned knuckles from riding too close to a fence or a wall.
Let me make the decision to wear a helmet don't force me to do something that is designed to CYA.
WyoTraveler
Explorer
Feb 03, 2015
rk911 wrote:
ScottG wrote:
When I was 14 y/o (1975) I had a young friend die from a bike accident. A helmet would have kept him from any serious injusry. If I had a CG I would employ a helmet rule and in this state it's the law.
You never know where these rules come from. It's such a minor thing to ask of their guests and it could be it came about for a pretty good reason.

and that's the inherent problem with all of these well-meaning, nanny rules. my wife and I are perfectly able to care for ourselves. want to encourage helmets, fine. but the decision is, or should be, ours.

You are right some these rules came about usually because of stupid people or people who sue. However, bikes, like motorcycles require helmets in some areas. If a rider gets hurt more without a helmet it would also be unfair to make the other party pay more because of no helmet, safety belt etc.
winnietrey
Explorer
Feb 03, 2015
I am sure they are worried about being sued. Otherwise they probably could care less. Their insurance may require it.
As a side note, I am a semi serious bike rider. I personally would never ride without a helmet. Even in a campground. But that is just me. Others will feel differently about the need for a helmet. But head injuries are nasty things, and a risk I choose to reduce as much as possible. But again just me.
rk911
Explorer
Feb 03, 2015
ScottG wrote:
...It's such a minor thing to ask of their guests and it could be it came about for a pretty good reason.

and that's the inherent problem with all of these well-meaning, nanny rules. individually they're all minor things but collectively we're being buried by these minor things. my wife and I are perfectly able to care for ourselves. want to encourage helmets, fine. but the decision is, or should be, ours.
ScottG
Nomad
Feb 03, 2015
When I was 14 y/o (1975) I had a young friend die from a bike accident. A helmet would have kept him from any serious injusry. If I had a CG I would employ a helmet rule and in this state it's the law.
You never know where these rules come from. It's such a minor thing to ask of their guests and it could be it came about for a pretty good reason.
Road_Runners
Explorer
Feb 03, 2015
TucsonJim wrote:
It's private property, and they can impose any rules they wish. If they get too ridiculous, they they'll start losing customer's business. I wonder if the bicycle helmet rule is based upon some liability issue they've dealt with in the past? I wouldn't put it past some people to get injured riding their bikes, then sue the campground for their own lack of responsibility.

I was thinking the same thing.
TucsonJim
Explorer II
Feb 03, 2015
It's private property, and they can impose any rules they wish. If they get too ridiculous, they they'll start losing customer's business. I wonder if the bicycle helmet rule is based upon some liability issue they've dealt with in the past? I wouldn't put it past some people to get injured riding their bikes, then sue the campground for their own lack of responsibility.
rk911
Explorer
Feb 03, 2015
C-Bears wrote:
In the past couple of years full timing we have visited maybe 50 campgrounds in over 26 states. There are always a list of rules, most of which are generally the same.

It seems we have started to see numerous CG's that do not allow pets. I don't know if this has always been the case or not.

The most unusual rule I think we found was at a CG in California. We carry two bicycles mounted on the front of our tow vehicle. When the check-in lady saw them she immediately pointed out to us that we were required to wear helmets at all times while using our bicycles in the campground. Upon further inquiries we discovered that this was not any type of goofy local or state requirement, just a CG rule.

can you pls post the name and location of that campground so we can add it to our 'avoid' list?

Forum Discussion

CG Rules - New Trends?

About RV Tips & Tricks

Related Content

Winnebago Trend?

Winnebago Trend

New Trend?

RGV ten year trend

Silly Truck Trends