Our Worst Camping Weekend
We are fortunate to live close by a beautiful Provincial Park and try to use it when we get a break in our busy summer schedules. The wife and I both have fairly stressful jobs and it's nice to get aw...
Forum Discussion
DiskDoctr wrote:JJBIRISH wrote:
I just don’t see cruelty as the answer to a problem…
Not cruelty, defense of oneself from harm. Inalienable Right, period.
Now had the victim stepped on the mad dog's neck, pinning it to the ground for 20 secs before twisting his foot and crippling the hound while it whimpered, THAT would have been "cruel"
A quick and definitive act to protect himself from continuous and repeated harm...that's not cruel.
No matter how much one likes dogs (I do, very much), there is no rationalization possible that allows a dog to continually attack a person for 3 seconds or 3 minutes.
Nothing in my post can be construed to be rationalization of the bad behavior of the dog or the dog’s owner…
I clearly stated that my opinion is that the kicker put himself in to that position as the self-appointed rule enforcer… and to put on his display of bravado…
that removes any contention that this was some form of auto defensive move…
that’s still my opinion…
Inalienable Right…:B:B:B give me a break so you now want to make this is a civil rights case… what a joke…
Why not sometime post about your inalienable responsibilities… na it’s easier to be a victim…
It’s two people behaving badly and you trying to rationalize the bad behavior of the kicker as something Nobel… the whole story loses credibility as the facts expand or change…
Without more credible information that doesn’t seem to exist, the best that can happen is we will continue to disagree… and we do...
