fj12ryder wrote:
irishtom29 wrote:
Some here are criticizing the OP not for being wrong in what he said but for having said it.
I don't believe it is what he said, but rather the way he said it that people are taking exception to. Amazingly enough people sometimes don't care to be talked down to, or addressed in a supercilious manner.
Your post would have some weight if I had actually criticized some individual owner or park which I did not do.
I looked at broad categories of parks that I have encountered and purposely did not name them. Good or bad. I conglomerated them into so called categories. All ANONYMOUS.
Please explain to me how much fairer or balanced can one be?
