coolmom42 wrote:
dewey02 wrote:
coolmom42 wrote:
If you are in city limits of most towns, you don't want to be discharging a fire-arm of any type.
Simplest & most humane option is to live-trap him and relocate him far far away.
. Squirrels are just rats with bushy tails. I have no problem with terminating them. Relocating them simply makes them someone else's problem.
I have no problem with terminating them, either, if they are 1) a meal or 2) impossible to relocate.
One squirrel is not worth dressing for a meal, and almost everyone lives close enough to a state or city park to find a good relocation spot.
I'm more interested in live and let live, no point in killing an animal just because you can.
I guarantee that if you live in a city and relocate a squirrel to a city park, he will just end up in someone else's attic, vehicle, etc. When there is food and (warm) shelter, what makes you think a squirrel is going to stay somewhere he will be cold and hungry? As someone else said, you can save them up until you have enough to eat. Another option is to leave them outside and some other critter gets a free meal. I don't support killing an animal just because you can, if that were true, I'd be out shooting birds, the neighbor's dogs and cats, etc. I believe in killing animals that cause real destruction and problems. I was renting a house in S. Illinois and about 4 months after we moved to another house, we learned that the previous house had burned to the ground because squirrels got in the attic and chewed through the electrical wiring. These vermin should not be taken lightly.