Forum Discussion

outwestbound's avatar
outwestbound
Explorer
Mar 19, 2014

WD Hitch; 2" vs. 2.5" receiver; Ford 250 issue

Greetings from a newbie. My plan is to full time out west/ mountains.

I'm evaluating a purchase of a new truck and travel trailer. My question relates to maximizing a new truck's tow rating capacity by the proper application of hitching methodology, rather than "will this pull a specific amount of weight" type question.

The TT will be large; around 36-38 all in, but not selected yet. Looking to buy 2014 F250, 6.7L turbo diesel, 4x4, crew cab, SRW, 3.55 rear end, 6.75' bed, 156.2 wheel base and rated in Ford's towing literature at 14,000 max load, 23,500 GCWR and comes with a 2.5" receiver class V hitch. (torn over 6.75' vs. 8' bed with crew cab, but that's for another post)

My goal is to, assuming proper weights in TV of course, get the max tow rating out of this 250. In Ford's 2014 super duty literature, page 3, there is a table "Hitch Receiver Weight Capacity" and my truck rates 14,000 trailer, 1,400 tongue, assuming a weight distribution hitch set up, which I want.

The issue is note 3, which says "2.5 receiver. If the provided 2.5 inch to 2.0 inch adapter is used, this reduces the Max. Trailer Capacity to 12,500 and the Max. Tongue Loan to 1,250 lbs." The reason it's an issue is because every trailer dealer says they only carry 2" WD hitches (used with the $15 adapter sleeve)and they say they've never heard of a WD hitch with a 2.5" receiver. As I am completely clueless myself, I feel that loosing this towing capacity on a $60+K truck because I have to use a $15 part seems ridiculous IF Ford's note 3 is to be taken seriously in the first place. I'm very, very concerned about safety and want lots of cushion and money isn't important when safety is the issue.

In my spreadsheet calculating all the weights and tolerances, capacities, etc., I'd very much like to use 14,000 because of the reserve/ cushion capacity.

Does it make sense to buy a class V 2.5" receiver WD rig for my travel trailer (they do exists but are about 3X the cost)so I avoid the adapter and capacity loss (per note 3)? Or, should I interpret Ford's note 3 as bull... and use the $15 adaptor AND keep using 14,000 in my calculations. Or, should I just use the adapter and live with the rating loss AND only use the lower ratings in my calculations?

Please forgive the length. I hope this made sense.

Thanks
  • myredracer wrote:
    Maybe for another thread, but FWIW, if you get a crewcab and a long box, you may find that towing a long TT of 36-38' will be a handful for getting around corners, especially on city streets. With only a 29' TT, our F250 with supercab and long box can be "fun" to get around tighter corners sometimes. I find I have to get some turns set up right before entering it otherwise I can brush the tires on the curb or end up over the curb. But, to me a truck is not a truck unless it has a long box. We make use of the full 8' a lot.


    Great comment. I'll probably post elsewhere. I must have the crew cab, but I'm down to two issues; namely, 1) bed length 6.75ish vs. 8 and 2) suspension "comfort" when driving around town unloaded.

    My strategy is to full-time 2-3 years thereabouts, then return, buy a S&B house, then drive the tow vehicle as a full-time vehicle. Now that my TT selections have necessitated moving up from 1/2 ton to 3/4, I'm much more concerned about ride. I've driven new F250s and the GM/Chevy 2500 in the last 2 weeks and today, the RAM 2500 (coil, no air bags). I'm generally satisfied that any 3/4 ton would be comfortable enough unloaded, but I'm interested in this Ram option to get air bags, if available. For reasons I'm just looking into, the RAM rates to tow more too boot. As to issue 1, I'm looking to find a crew + 8' to drive and see how a 22+ long truck feels in a parking lot, etc.
  • If you're going with that big a truck and going full time, I would look at 5th's for sure. More room, very nice inside. Shorter overall length and less sway I am told. Some even have gens on them. They cost more new but there are many great used ones out there.
  • bretm151 wrote:
    I replaced the Ford receiver on my F250 with a Curt 15410 because I was worried I would be over 1250/12500 rating of the Ford receivier. With 17,000 pound max trailer weight, 2550 lb max tongue weight ratings, it pretty much make the receiver a non-issue...

    It is a 2" receiver, which also got rid of adapter questions, etc. The only catch is that the WDH limits are about 1500 pounds with a 2" receiver (you can get a 1700 Reese with the 2.5"), but that was enough for my use.

    It was about $400 installed.

    Bret


    I have the same Curt hitch as you. The blue OX WDH has a capacity of 2000 TW and is a 2" shank.