Forum Discussion
valhalla360
Aug 31, 2017Navigator
fj12ryder wrote:
Hey, I see a safe place way inland: Oklahoma...oops, earthquakes, tornadoes, and floods. Okay, Kansas, Missouri, and Iowa, all way inland so must be safe...oops again, floods and tornadoes. Okay, Colorado, oops...avalanches, tornadoes, floods, and forest fires.
Gosh, what's a person to do except suck it up.
Actually,
- if you don't live in a river flood plane, floods are a non-issue.
- All the tornadoes in all the states you listed for the last 20yrs don't come close to the number of homes destroyed by this one storm.
- No avalanches in Denver.
rxji is overly harsh but yes building in coastal areas really does need to be limited and done with natural disasters in mind.
For example, we took the boat down the River system from Chicago to Mobile. There were newer homes in the flood plane along many of the rivers but they were built on stilts ranging from 8-20' high. I'm sure it added to the construction costs but it changes a flood from a total devastation of the house to a nuisance and that's how it should be. It still bugs the heck out of me that they rebuilt many parts of New Orleans knowing full well the next storm is likely to destroy those same houses.
About RV Tips & Tricks
Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,102 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 18, 2025