Another short answer: Yes.
Longer answer: 100W is only enough for a very light use, and only if there is some sun. On a dark day 100W panel becomes a "battery maintainer", providing few AH a day, enough to compensate for self-discharge but not enough for anything else.
If you are a very light user, say, your energy needs are 20-30 AH a day, with this setup you can live without a generator a couple of weeks with 50% sunshine. After 2 weeks you'll have to run a generator for 5-6 hours, and then again 2 weeks on solar. Theoretically, when there are no clouds at all, such a minimalist user could stay indefinitely. In practice, you might want fans when it's hot, TV when it's windy, and furnace when it's cold.
With today's cheap panels and expensive gas you should get another 2*100W. 300W array will pay for itself in a year or two, if you camp a lot. To me, it would pay for itself from the day one since I wouldn't have to put up with noise and smell of generator, but other people are more tolerant to this. You will (probably) have to upgrade the cable to #8 or #6 then, and also upgrade controller to 25-30A.
Or, a shortcut - use those additional 2*100W as a portable add-on. Lean them to the wall outside, connect in parallel, and buy 15A controller just for this 2*100W pair. No beefy cable, no installation. But if you are staying less than 3-4 days at the same place, you are not going to like folding/unfolding it every time.
Portable kit for those lazy:
$460. Controller, cables and Y-splitters are included. Controller is of course cr.ap, Z-brackets are a poor choice for roof setup and are useless for portable setup. I wouldn't buy this kit for roof-mounting, and wouldn't buy it at all. But as a quick and dirty portable, it will work.
PS: forget about recommended 150W solar per 100 AH battery. The more W, the better. The only thing you should worry about is that max post-controller amps should not exceed max charging current for your battery bank.