Forum Discussion
- 3_tonsExplorer III
time2roll wrote:
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
More health issue than green.
You think I'm exaggerating about the impact of new green laws?https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/California-law-to-eventually-ban-gas-powered-lawn-16522118.php
In reality it has very little to do with health, and much more to do with the Orwellian impulse to constrict individual rights ….In this particular incarnation, the leveraging of one’s ‘eco-guilt’ (a reactive impulse) equates to open acceptance and conformity of what is the official disseminated narrative (minus supporting science)…This is why there’s little to no public interest to determine and demand the ‘supporting science’…Nothing whatsoever new here, historically a well practiced tactic that’s been devised in various forms to achieve otherwise unachievable agendas, but to the subsequent regrets of the many…”Where’s the call for the supporting Science?? - Subsidies are the paths necessary to quell these demands - incentives today, edicts tomorrow…
3 tons MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
More health issue than green.
You think I'm exaggerating about the impact of new green laws?https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/California-law-to-eventually-ban-gas-powered-lawn-16522118.php- notevenExplorer III
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
You think I'm exaggerating about the impact of new green laws?https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/California-law-to-eventually-ban-gas-powered-lawn-16522118.php
That's nothing MEX - lakes in Canada have now banned riding your snowmobile on them when they are liquid unless it is electric
Snowmobile in lake - MEXICOWANDERERExplorerYou think I'm exaggerating about the impact of new green laws?https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/California-law-to-eventually-ban-gas-powered-lawn-16522118.php
- pianotunaNomad III3 tons,
You mean there *are* adults here???? - 3_tonsExplorer III
time2roll wrote:
Timmo! wrote:
Fair enough. My local university has similar size system. Although it is all on top of the buildings and parking structures. ZERO additional land use.
Homey, could not verify what they have personally, but I bet they recycle their empty White Claw cans.
It does not surprise met that a hoity toity ivy league university that churns generations of pontificators that speak about all things woke (aka elites), has such a teensy weensy solar footprint. Why spend their endowment bucks to go 100% solar, just wait and pretty soon the Feds will start giving them away. Right?
Not saying this is the end all solution.... however as more people and businesses participate it will go a long way with NO additional land use, NO additional transmission lines.
Enough Santa Claus with incentives... need more Grinch with mandates. One watt per square foot required for all new residential and all additions is my suggestion. Similar for business.
“I’m from the Gov’t and I’’m here to help (minus their gifted subsidies??)”… We’ll, with this current incarnation of overly pedigreed (pampered) guru’’s - are these the same Wizards of Smarts that have created 90% of our current maladies (incl. forest management, ‘theories’ et al) based on faux promises??…With a demise of Adults in the room, it’s kinda difficult for me to see how any real solutions (devoid of their Purple Unicorn ‘Scientism’) might materialize, especially since they’re not interested in objective findings - JMO, but based on aged results based real world observation…
3 tons Timmo! wrote:
Fair enough. My local university has similar size system. Although it is all on top of the buildings and parking structures. ZERO additional land use.
Homey, could not verify what they have personally, but I bet they recycle their empty White Claw cans.
It does not surprise met that a hoity toity ivy league university that churns generations of pontificators that speak about all things woke (aka elites), has such a teensy weensy solar footprint. Why spend their endowment bucks to go 100% solar, just wait and pretty soon the Feds will start giving them away. Right?
Not saying this is the end all solution.... however as more people and businesses participate it will go a long way with NO additional land use, NO additional transmission lines.
Enough Santa Claus with incentives... need more Grinch with mandates. One watt per square foot required for all new residential and all additions is my suggestion. Similar for business.- Timmo_Explorer IIHomey, could not verify what they have personally, but I bet they recycle their empty White Claw cans.
It does not surprise met that a hoity toity ivy league university that churns generations of pontificators that speak about all things woke (aka elites), has such a teensy weensy solar footprint. Why spend their endowment bucks to go 100% solar, just wait and pretty soon the Feds will start giving them away. Right? - So none of the researchers have home solar or an EV?
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,211 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 08, 2025