Forum Discussion
pianotuna
Apr 26, 2013Nomad III
Hi harold,
why-amorphous-panels-perform-well-in-low-light
and from:
Amorphous
" Having said that, for a given power rating, they do perform better at low light levels than crystalline panels - which is worth having on a dismal winter's day. "
and from:
post #1
"Amorphous panels are clearly the best for low light performance--but are relatively speaking huge."
I think---you should have googled better?
why-amorphous-panels-perform-well-in-low-light
and from:
Amorphous
" Having said that, for a given power rating, they do perform better at low light levels than crystalline panels - which is worth having on a dismal winter's day. "
and from:
post #1
"Amorphous panels are clearly the best for low light performance--but are relatively speaking huge."
I think---you should have googled better?
harold1946 wrote:
All data shows thin film (amorphous) is the least efficient of the four types of panels, and has the lowest power output per square foot of all, in all light conditions.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,361 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 21, 2026