3 tons wrote:
As I pointed out, Expion claims 3 x faster.. I have no desire whatsoever to conduct my own empirical timed test to challenge their claim as I’m quite happy to leave that level of parsing to someone who’s doggedly interested - lol... it’s plenty enough for me just to have optimized solar harvest recover times to much faster than with my former equivalent capacity GC’s - from ‘back-to-back’ experience Expion’s claim of 3 x faster recovery than with FWC seems at least somewhat realistic to me (+ or -), thus not really worth disputing Expion’s claim...JMHO,
3 tons
IMO all they are doing is saying you can charge the LFP at 1C but the FLA's at only 0.3C so that to them means "3 x faster"--which is total hogwash when you define "faster" in terms of AH restoration over time unless you can provide the scenario in detail, for an RV set-up.
You did however do an empirical timed test to prove that somehow your solar charging is "much faster" with LFP than with your previous GCs.
It would be interesting to see your figures that show that, and with that, what you mean by "faster".