Forum Discussion
BFL13
Nov 25, 2016Explorer II
I don't know if you saw this in another thread about AGMs
https://mopar1973man.com/topic/8408-pd4655-converter-charging-graph/
He had decent results with his 4655 and a pair of AGMs as you can see.
I am wondering if it was the AGMs themselves with their low R that helped the PD keep its amps up better than usual during bulk. Please report what you get if not too much trouble.
--So my notion that a WFCO would go into boost more likely with AGMs didn't work in your case? I thought with the smaller voltage spike with AGMs on starting the charge, the WFCO would be more likely to see less than 13.2v and go into boost as designed.
https://mopar1973man.com/topic/8408-pd4655-converter-charging-graph/
He had decent results with his 4655 and a pair of AGMs as you can see.
I am wondering if it was the AGMs themselves with their low R that helped the PD keep its amps up better than usual during bulk. Please report what you get if not too much trouble.
--So my notion that a WFCO would go into boost more likely with AGMs didn't work in your case? I thought with the smaller voltage spike with AGMs on starting the charge, the WFCO would be more likely to see less than 13.2v and go into boost as designed.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,282 PostsLatest Activity: Jul 12, 2025