Hi landyacht318,
I do believe that many folk underestimate their daily consumption and as a result are undersize on both their battery bank and solar. A good energy audit with no fudging should be a prerequisite for bank sizing. I sure wish that LiPo batteries could be charged and low temperatures. It would make life easier.
You have taken action to reduce consumption, and live full time within those constraints.
I have taken the other side of that coin. I want to be able to run everything just as if I were on shore power. Now that I'm full time I do not have enough solar to meet my desires. I do have enough to meet basic needs without any inverter use. I suppose I could urban dock near McDonald's and the like to feed my addiction to the wobbly wide web--but I'd really rather do that in my RV home.
I believe solar is a battery charger, so I focus on:
adequate ability to equalize the bank.
adequate capacity to get back to near or 100% state of charge.
As bank capacity increases the two figures above converge. One reason is that under heavy loads peukert favors greater capacity.
Others believe solar is an energy source.
landyacht318 wrote:
It is far too easy to have too little solar.
My rooftop is maxed out solar wise, So I lowered my battery capacity so that the solar could at least approach the battery manufacturer 'recommended' initial charge rate of 10%, or 10 amps per 100AH capacity, at high noon..
I don't think it is just a matter of replacing the AH used +~10% more, but having a higher wattage to capacity ratio. The happy battery is the one whose properly programmed solar controller decided to float it at 11AM on that gloriously sunny day. Not so gloriously sunny, hopefully float by 3. Cloudy, at least it will negate some daily usage.
Any solar is better than no solar, but a proper amount of solar for ones battery capacity ultimately makes for a happier battery. In my opinion, and experience, full timing.