LittleBill wrote:
DrewE wrote:
LittleBill wrote:
there is literally no need for a main breaker, don't even know why people are suggesting it.
wherever he plugs in will protect the wire from the rv to the receptacle, the smaller breaker will protect the wire inside the rv.
The NEC requires a main disconnect (i.e. a main breaker, or a switch and fuses) when more than two branch circuits are used. If only two branch circuits are used, it's apparently not actually required, but still IMHO a very good idea for a couple of reasons:
1. It gives a good way to shut off the 120V power to the RV for performing maintenance or in the case of an emergency. This is likely the main reason the NEC requires it.
2. If you plug into e.g. a 50A RV receptacle and have no main breaker, a short in the electric panel or excess current use by the combined branch circuits could overload the shore power cord.
I'd rather be safe than sorry, particularly since a 30A breaker is not all that expensive.
explain this item to me then, since i own a similar one
clicky
Simple. That is a residential subpanel, and the main disconnect for the building is elsewhere, typically the main breaker for the main panel. The requirements for subpanels in the same building and for the panels in RVs, while similar in many regards, are not precisely identical. The main disconnect requirements for an RV are more closely aligned with that for outbuildings, while the grounding and bonding requirements more like those for subpanels in the same building. That said, RVs do have their own distinct section of the code.