Forum Discussion
MEXICOWANDERER
May 10, 2019Explorer
I still want someone to build chambers with enough examples of vacuum insulated CO2 and regular air then % proportionately fill them with CO2 then set them out for thermal studies. Hard numbers are irrefutable and politics proof.
Scientists and astrophysicists have known about solar cycles and knew greater cycles have produced profound climate effects on this planet in recorded history.
Glacial eras had absolutely nothing to do with with atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Yet the Potomac River froze over in the late 1700's, there was a mini ice age in the 1300's. And for the next 30 years we are going to be immersed in a major temperature down trend. And the climate geniuses did not see this coming?
This is why I have zero faith in government sponsored projects. Crying wolf ridicules the honest facts.
To harvest starshine may entail producing more pollution from manufacturing than harvesting would ever compensate for.
Why not study gas reformers that would exchange methane (cowfarts) for less polluting alternatives? Not really cowfarts but methane rich natural gas?
Too much blowhard politics and not enough research for me. Let the Weather Channel and National Meteorological Society fund the CO2 studies. They emit enough unsupported hot air and threaten meteorologist licenses for not adhering to their Seig Heil demands of Climate Change or was it Global Warming? When failed lawyers make laws without studies, we're in trouble.
Scientists and astrophysicists have known about solar cycles and knew greater cycles have produced profound climate effects on this planet in recorded history.
Glacial eras had absolutely nothing to do with with atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Yet the Potomac River froze over in the late 1700's, there was a mini ice age in the 1300's. And for the next 30 years we are going to be immersed in a major temperature down trend. And the climate geniuses did not see this coming?
This is why I have zero faith in government sponsored projects. Crying wolf ridicules the honest facts.
To harvest starshine may entail producing more pollution from manufacturing than harvesting would ever compensate for.
Why not study gas reformers that would exchange methane (cowfarts) for less polluting alternatives? Not really cowfarts but methane rich natural gas?
Too much blowhard politics and not enough research for me. Let the Weather Channel and National Meteorological Society fund the CO2 studies. They emit enough unsupported hot air and threaten meteorologist licenses for not adhering to their Seig Heil demands of Climate Change or was it Global Warming? When failed lawyers make laws without studies, we're in trouble.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,210 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 02, 2025