Forum Discussion
- 96Bounder30EExplorer II
imadtchmn wrote:
Give the man a pat on the back. That is exactly what it is.
K Charles Posted: 08/18/15 07:01pm
It's a vibration dampener.
Don't you think K Charles deserves one too........:h - imadtchmnExplorer
Matt_Colie wrote:
If you mean the weight, that was mass added to change the natural frequency of the engine/transmission to cut down on viration. GM started that in the late 60's.
Matt
Give the man a pat on the back. That is exactly what it is. - Matt_ColieExplorer IIIf you mean the weight, that was mass added to change the natural frequency of the engine/transmission to cut down on viration. GM started that in the late 60's.
Matt - wa8yxmExplorer IIII see a transmission tailpiece, A tool box and tool tray, and the bracket is the transmission rear mount unless I miss my guess.. not all transmissions have 'em but some do.
It may not be a "hard mount" like a motor mount but rather a "Bumper" to prevent excessive side to side movement of the tailpiece which would cost you torque and possibly damage. - BTPO1Explorer
K Charles wrote:
It's a vibration dampener.
X2, I seem to remember one on some of the transmissions that I have had. - K_CharlesExplorerIt's a vibration dampener.
- Corkey05Explorer
imgoin4it wrote:
That was my first thought too, but the disconnect on my 95 S10 Blazer was on the third member (differential). That way when disconnected the drive shaft doesn't spin when the vehicle is being towed. If disconnected at the tranny it would spin full time, a recipe for vibrations and pending self destruct.
A guess, but maybe part of a drive shaft disconnect.
As a side note it sure does look like the disconnect bracket I had. - imgoin4itExplorerA guess, but maybe part of a drive shaft disconnect.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,203 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 21, 2025