Your opinion of Battery Desulfators
Hi All - A while back, only a couple of months after I installed my 2 GC2 245 AMP hour batteries and solar panels, I had an accidental removal of the breakaway pin which caused our 5th wheel brakes to...
Forum Discussion
With all due respect...
Battery Minder's, claim to fame is as a battery maintenance device, not a damaged battery recovery tool. As such the Battery Minder does a satisfactory job of maintaining a properly charged battery against unnecessary degradation.
The few dedicated damaged battery recovery tools on the market are flaky. No consul in their right mind is going to pursue a shallow pockets wraith operation.
To prove in litigation the validity or lack of "pulse charge desulfation
efficacy would take hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars in sanctioned studies supported by expert testimony.
Pro Bono? I think not. Any case brought against a company like Battery Minder would face almost certain failure because if you read the nomenclature carefully it does not imply that the performance of its produce would any way recover or heal a damaged battery.
Some of the NDA's I signed are for 99 years. Foremost is prohibition against the revelation of identity. In order to fund these projects I had to partition and segment individual aspects so as to not present collusion.
I found not one hint of advantage of "pulse technology" over proper battery maintenance as I have outlined on this forum for many years. Head to head kWh consumption analyzed by 10x optical plate weight loss and sulfation occlusion percentage were indistinguishable in comparison.
Because I utilized technology that encompassed Kilowatts of energy and frequencies to in excess of 1 Ghz it eliminated pulse charging as a viable tool to remove hardened sulfation. I forfeited a lot of money because I declined to endorse the technology in any form. My boilerplate answer was, and is, "I have to live with myself".
Don't feel abused by my cutting remarks about attorneys. When I encounter a personal doctor that practices rote that endangers my health I poke with sarcasm. When they respond my response is "I have a scientific discipline -- you have a *practice". I am just as cutting with anyone who has a hand out for my money and is an incompetent boob. When I fail to resolve an issue I do not expect one cent of remittance. People who do not know me accuse me of having "ethics". How dare them.
Battery Minder's, claim to fame is as a battery maintenance device, not a damaged battery recovery tool. As such the Battery Minder does a satisfactory job of maintaining a properly charged battery against unnecessary degradation.
The few dedicated damaged battery recovery tools on the market are flaky. No consul in their right mind is going to pursue a shallow pockets wraith operation.
To prove in litigation the validity or lack of "pulse charge desulfation
efficacy would take hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars in sanctioned studies supported by expert testimony.
Pro Bono? I think not. Any case brought against a company like Battery Minder would face almost certain failure because if you read the nomenclature carefully it does not imply that the performance of its produce would any way recover or heal a damaged battery.
Some of the NDA's I signed are for 99 years. Foremost is prohibition against the revelation of identity. In order to fund these projects I had to partition and segment individual aspects so as to not present collusion.
I found not one hint of advantage of "pulse technology" over proper battery maintenance as I have outlined on this forum for many years. Head to head kWh consumption analyzed by 10x optical plate weight loss and sulfation occlusion percentage were indistinguishable in comparison.
Because I utilized technology that encompassed Kilowatts of energy and frequencies to in excess of 1 Ghz it eliminated pulse charging as a viable tool to remove hardened sulfation. I forfeited a lot of money because I declined to endorse the technology in any form. My boilerplate answer was, and is, "I have to live with myself".
Don't feel abused by my cutting remarks about attorneys. When I encounter a personal doctor that practices rote that endangers my health I poke with sarcasm. When they respond my response is "I have a scientific discipline -- you have a *practice". I am just as cutting with anyone who has a hand out for my money and is an incompetent boob. When I fail to resolve an issue I do not expect one cent of remittance. People who do not know me accuse me of having "ethics". How dare them.
