Forum Discussion

Mike_Up's avatar
Mike_Up
Explorer
Dec 14, 2014

2014 F150 Ecoboost Review

I guess you could call me a truck and car enthusiast and I really enjoy driving different ones and comparing. I always thought I'd buy a car when my truck is paid off, using the truck strictly for towing, snow, and off road use, and the car for commuting. BUT you never know how things are going to go.

I previously have driven quite a few F150 Ecoboost trucks and came away with the experience that they offer better torque at higher highway speeds but don't have the consistency and stop light acceleration I like in the 5.0L.

It does seem that Ford may have finally stopped the condensation problems in the 2014 F150s but some have said the power is reduced. Well since the problem seems to have been corrected, I wanted to test drive one.

What I found is that power does seem reduced from the 2013 Ecoboost trucks I drove but the power delivery characteristics seem the same.

I recently had to pick up a vacuum hose from the dealer and while there, I test drove a 2014 Ecoboost equipped just like my truck. It was the same except it had 3.55 gears instead of 3.73 gears, had leather and center console, and had a backup camera. Otherwise, truck was exactly the same down to color.

I wanted to compare power output in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th gears and be more critical than I have been previously with Ecoboost trucks.

Now this isn’t a hate review as the Ecoboost was really nice. The key likes, very smooth engine with just enough V6 rumble to know it was not a typical V6 car engine. It also had great 4th gear torque which would do good towing at speed.

The big benefit I seen in power delivery over the 5.0L is in 4th and 5th gears from 2000 to 3500 rpms. It had a lot of torque not needing to shift to accelerate. The downfall is that it didn’t downshift as easy and sometimes felt slower than the 5.0L that downshifted to the next lower gear for greater torque output. The Ecoboost would do the same under more throttle. This trait will likely offer a better towing experience to those who don’t like their trucks to downshift as the greater torque will still accelerate good without a downshift.

The biggest negative was in 1st and 2nd gear where there wasn’t really any power under 2000 rpms. The 5.0L has a lot more power under 2000 rpms and will have much stronger take offs from a stop.

With 1st gear, I noticed power was as I said, pretty low from 1000 rpm to 2000 rpms but power started to build at 2000 to 3000 rpms. It was adequate but still not as strong as the 5.0L up to 3000 rpm. Since I wasn’t racing and I was concerned with driveability, I did not take 1st much over 3000 rpm.

2nd gear seemed to have better performance from 2000 - 3000 rpms, but not quite as much as the 5.0L.

With 3rd gear, I’d say it was a toss up between the 2 motors in most rpm ranges when accelerating moderately. However the Ecoboost was slower to downshift making it feel unresponsive. However with more aggressive acceleration it downshifted quickly but was harder to stay at a speed you wanted without overshooting. 3rd gear was really a toss up with the 5.0L transmission being a bit more responsive.

4th is where the Ecoboost shined the brightest. It seemed to have stronger torque output than the 5.0L between 2000 and 3500 rpms, most likely making it tow a bit easier at lower rpms. However power really seemed to take a nose dive at around 4500 rpm where the 5.0L power kept building.

This 2014 Ecoboost truck doesn’t seem as powerful as the 2013 trucks I’ve driven especially under 3000 rpms in 1st and 2nd gears. It also felt less powerful in 3rd and 4th gear as well.

The 2013 just felt more powerful overall with the same power delivery characteristic as the 2014. I still prefer the 5.0L but the Ecoboost does offer more torque in 4th gear.

This follows what pickuptrucks.com found with higher gears offering great lowend torque and lower gears offering less.
  • With an XLT and Ecoboost, you can only get the 3.73 locker with a Max Tow package and that's rare.

    The dealers here usually only put Max Tow on Lariats and Plats. Plus they usually only have FX4 Ecos with 3.55s. Even so, a FX4 with 3.73 is even further off being a different trim and heavier.

    I previously test drove 5.0L trucks with 3.55s and 3.73s, and there was little difference in performance. The performance differences I stated between the 5.0L and Eco were very much different.

    Besides, if I were to buy another truck, it would be a XLT and with that, that's the closest comparison that I can make. I'm not a fan of the Lariats leather or the FX4 boy racer look. Each to their own, as everyone has different tastes.

    My 5.0L pulls my camper pretty effortlessly, so I cant think of really any gains with the Eco. BUT as I said with gears 4th and up, there's more torque so if downshifting bothers you, the Eco will do it less with these gears.

    Myself, the downshifting does't bother me, but the lag off the line does. It's a matter of personal taste.

    Of course, if you power braked the Eco, all that turbo lag at 1000 to 2000 rpm would be gone from a stop and it would be an animal but I drove it as I would drive it daily.

    I now have a better appreciation of the Eco because I pin pointed it's positives as well as it's negatives, to explain why my previous Eco drives felt as they did.

    If my truck doesn't last up to the warranty's 125,000 mile mark, I know now a bit more than I did previously to make a better truck buying decision.
  • I have too agree, the 3.55 is not going to feel the same as the 3.73 and will show up in off the line feel.

    I have yet to see a dog EB and have to say all it takes to get a EB driver going is for a Ram to pull alongside of it. ;) Just had one dust me sunday morning! :B

    Pulled alongside of him at the stop light and I told my DW watch this. I looked over at him and as soon as he looked over I nodded and it was on like Donkey Kong! Light turned green and he was gone in a flash, DW said yep you never stood a chance! LOL

    They are fast but then I am driving one of the slowest trucks out on the road. :C

    Don
  • Not sure it's a fair comparison with the 14 having only 3.55 gears. You think that had anything to do with slower starts? I do.
  • Now Ford has a 2.7L Ecoboost for the 2015 F-150. My boss wants a new F-150. I am trying to talk him into the new 2015 because of the higher MPG of the new models.

    The 2.7L Ecoboost compares very positive to the 3.5L, as the truck is lighter, the MPG is higher, and fuel cost per year goes down from $3,300 in the 5 liter or 3.5L Ecoboost to only $2,600 in the 2.7L Ecoboost! And the 2.7L is only a $750 option, while the 3.5L is a $1735 option! So overall the 2015 2.7L truck will be a lower total cost than the 3.5L 2014.

    Have fun shopping!

    Fred.
  • I will add after driving mine for two years, it is fun to drive with plenty of power / speed / comfort! Light years ahead of the company 2010 5.4 I drove for just over a year!
  • I've not driven a 5.0 or a 14 Eco, so I can't compare at all... But, my 13 Eco with 3.73 gears and taking off hard from the freeway on ramp lights is fun!!

    When the light turns green, I'll give it about 3/4 throttle until it just gets rolling. Then mat it... It shifts around the 5000 rpm mark thru 1st, 2nd, 3rd.. By the time you are pulling hard in third, you are over 60 mph and merging with traffic.. :)

    Even towing the trailer, on ramp merging is a breeze.. This thing will get up to speed really easy and towing the grades is even more of a blast! It really likes 4th gear and pulling an easy 2700 rpms or so holding a nice and easy 60 mph. If you want to go 65, just press the pedal a bit more. It'll easily do 70 if you just had to.. :)

    Coming from an 97 F150 with the 5.4, I can certainly say the 3.5 Eco makes that engine feel like the little 2.0 in my wifes Rav4! :)

    Mitch