agesilaus wrote:
Dayle1 wrote:
You didn't state what the problem was with the TST system and w/o understanding that, it would be a c**p shoot to expect another system to perform better. I do know that of the major brands, the TST system has the faster sample rate, so if you don't have signal integrity issues, none will alert you faster than it can.
Here is what i found during an earlier investigation:
TST, 6 seconds
Pressure Pro, 7 seconds
Tire Minder, 6 seconds
Doran, 12 seconds (implied but not stated)
Well my TST system is the older non-flow thru and it take a lot longer than your times to slowly cycle thru all the wheels. It is set up for a 16 wheeler and even if you only have 4 tires with the sensors it crawls thru all 16, one at a time.
I hope this Charchet system is better because it supposedly has real time monitoring of all 4 wheels and shows all four.
How fast the monitor cycles thru the different tires has nothing to do with the sample rate. With any of the systems, as soon as the sensor sends a 'fault' signal to the monitor, it will beep, flash, whatever. How frequent the display updates with numbers for the pressure and temp of each tire is unrelated. The display is useful driver info, but not critical to preventing or minimizing damage from a tire failure. Again, if you don't understand what was wrong with the TST system as an alarm system you may just be buying a 'feel good' system but actually less alarm protection. No system offers 100% continuous data, all must use a sample rate, otherwise sensor battery life would be extremely short. These systems are meant to be alarm systems, not monitor systems that require constant driver attention and distraction from the road ahead. Also, the TST system can be programmed to only display tires that have sensors on them and it will cycle only thru those locations, skipping all others.