Forum Discussion

BurbMan's avatar
BurbMan
Explorer II
Nov 30, 2014

Defective Michelin Tires

Not strictly tow vehicle related but thought you tire gurus may be interested in this. I just put a set of Michelin’s new Premier all-season tires on DW's Magnum. These are the tires they are advertising that don’t lose their wet weather grip when they are worn. They actually mold the rain grooves like dovetail slots, so that as the tire wears the rain grooves get wider as they get shallower, so they still channel the same quantity of water away from the tread.

The guys at the local Tire Discounters have been great, I have been using them for all my alignment work, but this is the first time buying a set of tires there. Out the door including the free alignment the set was $920, plus a $70 rebate by mail for a net price of $850. Pricey, but ironically less expensive that Goodyear. Unfortunately not many brand choices in the size they put on the Hemi R/T Magnum, P225/60-18.

So I take the car in to buy the tires, they tell me the right inner tie rod is shot, and so the alignment is not exact. They agree to give me coupon for another free alignment, since I wasn’t having them do the repair work. I get it home, jack it up, and I was able to confirm that the right inner tie rod was in fact shot, so at least I feel good that they aren’t selling me bogus work.

I order a set of inner/outer tie rods from Rock Auto and put them on the following week (the way Chrysler designed the front end on the Magnum/Charger/300 LX chassis these things eat tie rods, but that’s another story…), go back and get the car re-aligned, and I’m thinking all is good. We take the car to Indy for Thanksgiving and it was like riding in a blender…the steering wheel was dead calm, but there was a bad vibration in the seat that started at about 65 mph and got progressively worse with speed.

Back to Tire Discounters on Friday, they tell me that the LR tire was not balanced correctly, they re-balanced it and said all was good. I took the car out on the bypass and all was not good, it was still a blender with a steering wheel. Thinking it’s not the tires I decide to start my diagnostics yesterday. I put the car on jack stands in the garage to check it out. The vibration was definitely coming from the back, so I am looking at wheel bearings, CV joints (car has a live rear axle), U joints, driveshaft carrier bearings, anything that might have some play in it. I decide to start the car and let it run in gear at idle on the jack stands while I observe the drivetrain in motion.

Once the car was running, I immediately found the problem…it was the tires. I recorded a video on my phone with a ruler taped to a 2x4 next to the tires as a reference scale. Here is the video on YouTube. The first few seconds are the left rear tire, note how bad the runout is, almost 1/8” both radially and laterally. When the scene shifts that’s the right tire, which wasn’t as bad radially but actually worse laterally. The last part is a square next to the left rim showing that the rim is true and not bent. I did the same on the right rim, but accidentally saved it as a separate video.

So now on my 4th trip to Tire Discounters, I show the manager the video and he agreed that the tires were defective. They replaced the rear two yesterday and now the ride is smooth again. I’ve never gotten a defective tire like this, let alone a Michelin. The manager said they had a another customer who bought these tires and then switched brands after complaining about a harsh ride, so he wondered if it may have been the same issue….hard to believe that the tire tech balanced the LR not once but twice and never noticed the runout. I’m having mixed feelings about this….while I am glad they resolved the issue without giving me an argument, they never should have installed those tires to begin with.

Anyway, thought you guys might be interested in case anyone is tire shopping.

20 Replies

  • 0.05" is less than 1/16" and most cannot see that ...I can't

    The dots are easily rubbed off...some less so than others.
    If they have the same tires in the showroom, check if they
    have the dots... I'm suspicious...

    All high speed rated has them...even my Bridgestone "LT's"

    On pricing...higher speed rated & lower profile cost much more.
    Am restoring my 2 seater and will have V or Z rated 40 series.
    Should be in the +$900/ea range. Ditto higher load rated LT
    class on my Sub at $250/ea...better usually cost more

    Personally not sold on that extra width groove being able to make
    up for depth and channel enough to prevent hydroplaning

    Not just while moving, but most critical during braking and
    cornering

    Think yet another nail in Michelin for me
  • BurbMan, I watched your video, but it was disappointing. I was hoping to see some views of the Hemi Magnum R/T :).

    I can just never seem to learn a lesson about Michelin tires. I have a 2 year old set right now that are all cracked up just like my last set. I guess I just never learn.
  • Scott, everything that I have read online says 0.05" is maximum acceptable runout. The front tires spun true, and the manager said the new rear tires spun true also. The warranty form going back to Michelin has the DOT serial numbers of the tires, so I'm sure they will go back and look up lot, batch, etc. They are 4614 dates codes and made in USA.

    Ben, there are no yellow and red dots on the tires, maybe they got cleaned off with the mounting lubricant, so no way to check what you mention. The tires were only on for a week, so no curb impacts and the rims were true. Again, the front tires were fine it was only the rears. Supoosedly they layer tread compounds to combat tread block squirm, and I can tell you they don't feel squishy handling under a load. The previous pair of Michelins were about 2/3 worn and the wet traction just "went away". Same thing that happened to the LTX/MS when I had them on the burb.

    Agree about Michelin not being the company it once was, but every tire Goodyear had in this size was over $300. I want quality, but sadly there is a limit to my resources....

    Swapping the tires for a different pair where the tread grooves spun true fixed the vibration issue, so I can only conclude the tires were defective. Good point about the balancing machine lightfoot, the tech probably never saw the runout with the hood closed, even though the tire is still coasting down when the hood is opened. Who knows how many tires have runout like this? Maybe other cars aren't as sensitive to it? But I know if I spend almost a large for a new set of tires, I want a smooth ride.
  • Lynnmor wrote:
    I'll bet that the tire store sees that amount of runout on a large percentage of the tires they mount.


    This.
    An 1/8" is not generally considered bad and really pretty common.
  • Not sure what balance machine your shops are using, but mine has a cover over the wheel when i is spinning and one can not see the tire as it spins. Your shop probably has a similar unit so the tech can't see the run out and the machine is for balancing not run out.
  • Tires do need to 'break in' or 'cure' before they settle in. More so
    these days with whatever compounding/formulation they now use

    So the tire tech may have had a tire within spec. The second balancing
    should have had those tires broken in, or a maybe needed some more
    time on the pavement

    Ask the dealer to find out where those tires were made. Could also be
    just a batch/lot issue. ISO9000 is part of that forensics and why so
    key to where they are made. China does (both) not understand and those
    that do, don't care or are forbidden to do anything about it...for now

    Another potential is that 'dove tail' groove...I'd not own anything with
    that design. Totally counter to my intuition

    Stability of the tread blocks would be my concern. There are patents
    on how MS/AT tires manage tread block wiggle during high force maneuvers

    One has tapered from the bottom of the groove up to the pavement end.
    Another to get around that patent, has stepped taper. That was argued
    and lost because the OEM's engineers & lawyers verbiage left that
    door open

    With a wider groove at the base, can see the whole tread block wiggle
    during high stress maneuvers. Not a good thing...even wacky to me. You
    can check by looking at the tread block edges between the grooves. Look
    for tread block folding over to cleave the edges (the would be rounded
    or smoothed...maybe feathered...instead of a squared edge)

    Ask if sweetie drove over a curb, or some such at high speed.

    Ask if that dealership understands the sidewall dots in reference to
    mounting positioning and balance? There should be two. IIRC, main
    is yellow and secondary is red. They indicate where the valve stem
    should be aligned to them.

    If it takes too much weight using the yellow, then unmount to move
    the red in line.

    If neither works, then demount and rotate it 90*.

    If that doesn't work, defective and return to the factory

    Final possibility is that these tires were at the 'bottom' of the
    stack during shipment. I've unloaded lots and a few times found that
    bottom tire flattened and those could never be balanced right

    Reaffirms my opinion that Michelin is no longer the company I used to
    love. Something has changed and betcha upper/middle management no
    longer manage their product, but only their bottom line. Bean counter
    management at it's best and see all too often...
  • Good job! You'd think a tire shop would see that before you did.
  • I'll bet that the tire store sees that amount of runout on a large percentage of the tires they mount.
  • RoyB's avatar
    RoyB
    Explorer II
    You would think that tire defect would have shown up at the tire shop on the spin-up test for balance...

    Roy Ken