shelbyfv wrote:
Well, you did call me a "Yosemite." Don't know what that is but probably not a compliment. Next there was "I can't even begin to explain how ignorant that notion is...." I think your rep here is keyboard bully. If you are going to dish it out, don't get butt hurt when you get some back.:W Anyway, back to V2G. Obviously it's not ready but it's being worked on by folks smarter than you and me. Turtle's link shows that the grid is taxed only a few hours a day. Storing energy and having it available when needed would keep us from having to increase the capacity of power plants just to satisfy a transient peak demand. Maybe think of it like a well filling a water tank.
This is a Yosemite.....or it's what they say when you can hear them...
"Amazing double display of: let me see,1) psychiatric paranoia of hearing voices? 2) Or failure of reading comprehension?
1. Seeing and hearing posts that's not made?
2. Lack of understanding of what's been posted?
Whichever..."
I should not have alluded to you being like him, based on similar responses from both of you. Apologies.
Sorry, not butt hurt nor the other things you're saying. Just being real.
Generally, no almost always, if the numbers don't add up, then neither does the idea. That is all I'm saying...
Like your idea of the well, I like it, as it makes perfect sense.
You can pull water from the well (power grid) at a certain rate defined by how the produces, and you can pull up to what the well produces, anytime (theoretically, like during non peak usage times) and you can store that "water" in a tank (your Tesla/Lightning/camper batteries, whatever) and use it later when the well won't produce enough water on demand.
However the same problem or limitations exist with actual wells as does a power generating system and grid (if capacity is not increased). The more you go to the well, the more you take and then you begin depleting the well and the pretty soon you're borrowing from Peter to pay Paul until Peter can't loan you no more money.....and then you have to expand the system to meet demands.
So yes this "could" potentially buy a little time IF there was complete (read mandatory, not getting political, but so easy to make that inference...lol) participation. But at the end of the day, it's just postponing drilling another well. AND it will cost us, all of us, more in the long run because filling the holding tank during off peak hours rather than addressing the problem head on is of diminishing returns.
AND in this case, not even remotely financially feasible for anyone, really, even as a stop gap, UNLIKE the actual well, IF it was a residential well and you didn't have 100 more neighbors drilling new wells and reducing your already reduced capacity.