honda1
Feb 17, 2017Explorer
dino oil vs synthetic mpg
has any one when from dino oil to full synthetic oil & had better m p g & what oil & how much better m p g did you get ? i have 2011 chevy 2500 Duramax pulling 35 ft 5th wheel..
ktmrfs wrote:
mfg are slowly switching to synthetics to get the best mileage possible for EPA testing, along with the 0W oils. Now, the EPA test is a short time from a cold start. and they are worried about 0.1mpg differences.
So.... do synthetics improve mileage, yes, but not likely enough that you can tell, and the biggest effect is likely in short trips in cold climates. long trips, less so.
synthetic advantage is more in engine protection and cold temp starting not mpg improvements. and given todays engine longevity, not sure there is a payback. your choice.
Back in the 1960's living in the midwest and not having access to a garage or a way to plug in the block heater when in college, I used conoco DN600 polar start oil in the winter. not sure if it was a synthetic or not, but at -40F my car, and others that used it would crank much faster and usually start better than others running 10W-30 at the same temps.
jerem0621 wrote:
I have used both and have never seen a difference at all.
Now that we have the 2.0 EcoBoost in my wife’s car I probably will run Mobile 1 as I know there is a lot going on with the turbo and “stuff” like Bryan mentioned in his 1.0.
MPG will not be the main driver. I want this car to go to 200k plus.
Thanks!
Jeremiah
SCVJeff wrote:
I see significantly better mileage, sometimes in excess of 25% immediately after a synthetic change. But that drops off rapidly with the first tank of gas..~300-400 miles
It's not hype... it just doesn't last