Golden_HVAC wrote:
Somehow I don't think you have ever taken apart a car, and figured out what is inside.
When I owned a 1984 Diesel Isuzu, it had a manual transmission, and was great at slowing down by downshifting. The fully open air intake fills the cylinders with air, and then without your foot on the throttle, only a tiny amount of idle fuel level is injected, so barely any fuel is added to the cylinders, and you get a lot of braking action.
At the same time, the Ford diesel trucks used a transmission that did not like to transfer the maximum amount of engine braking as the engine could develop, so Ford decided to put the transmission into neutral while slowing, giving very little engine braking with the automatic transmission. If you selected the manual 5 speed (back in the 80's) then you get wonderful compression braking, yet not nearly as much as if you have a engine brake too.
Fred.
On the Older Ford and the Jeep Liberty diesel I don't think the tranny goes into neutral but rather the torque convertor goes into free wheeling to remove the engine braking. I haven't seen the actual engineering data so I could be wrong. The same end result tho. :)
In the carbed engines of the past which way did the engine turn faster with the starter, throttle plate open or closed? How about your riding lawn mower, throttle plate open or closed (no choke)?
Another question for everyone. Approx how much more power is required to turn a gas engine rpm for rpm compared to diesel engine or vice versa? (It varies somewhat depending on the engine model's valving, compression ratio, etc.) Give an approx.
When Cummins went from the two valves per cylinder to 4 valves in the I6 5.9 liter engine Used in the Dodge pickup they also increased the compression to ? and ? according to their engineering data?